Proteins related to schizophrenia and uses thereof

ABSTRACT

Presenilin Associated Membrane Protein (PAMP), and nucleic acids encoding this protein, are provided. PAMP and PAMP nucleic acids provide diagnostic and therapeutic tools for evaluating and treating or preventing neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. In a specific embodiment, mutations in PAMP are diagnostic for schizophrenia. The invention further relates to screening, particularly using high-throughput screens and transgenic animal models, for compounds that modulate the activity of PAMP and presenilins. Such compounds, or gene therapy with PAMP, can be used in treating neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders, particularly schizophrenia. In addition, the invention provides PAMP mutants, nucleic acids encoding for PAMP mutants, and transgenic animals expressing PAMP mutants, which in a preferred aspect result in biochemical, morphological, or neuropsychological changes similar to those associated with schizophrenia.

This patent application claims the priority of U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/229,889, filed Sep. 1, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of neurological and physiological dysfunctions associated with neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental diseases, especially schizophrenia. More particularly, the invention is concerned with the identification of proteins associated with neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental diseases, especially schizophrenia, and relates to methods of diagnosing these diseases, and to methods of screening for candidate compounds which modulate the interaction of a certain protein, specifically Presenilin Associated Membrane Protein (“PAMP”), with presenilin proteins.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The origin of and causes for schizophrenia, one of the most serious neuropsychiatric disorders, have long been sought after. A number of studies have suggested that schizophrenia is predominantly genetic, but it has proven difficult to show a significant genetic linkage. However, recently, a novel locus associated with inherited susceptibility to schizophrenia has been mapped to chromosome 1q21-q22, near the anonymous DNA markers D1S1653, D1S1679, and D1S1677 (Brzustowicz et al., 2000). Furthermore, several lines of evidence, both from morphological and neuropsychological findings, now indicate that schizophrenia may be a disease of central nervous system development (reviewed in Stefan et al, 1997). For example, Falkai et al., 2000, provided quantitative data showing that the positioning of neuron (pre-alpha cell) clusters was abnormal in schizophrenia patients, supporting the theory that schizophrenia derives from impaired brain development. Such abnormal neuron positions could, e.g., arise from failures of neuronal migration during fetal development.

An important pathway implicated in the development of the nervous system, as well as in schizophrenia, is the Notch signaling pathway. Notch is a protein receptor for inhibitory signals that shape the pattern of the nervous system, and the localization of Notch signaling is crucial for determining where neural precursor cells arise (Baker, 2000). In a series of 80 British parent-offspring trios, the NOTCH4 locus was highly associated with schizophrenia (Wei and Hemmings, 2000). Possible candidate sites conferring susceptibility to schizophrenia included an A-to-G substitution in the promoter region, and the (CTG)_(n) repeat in exon 1, of NOTCH4.

The presenilin proteins, i.e., presenilin 1 (PS1, encoded by the PS1 gene) and 2 (PS2, encoded by the PS2 gene), are involved in the Notch pathway, and form a close functional relationship with Notch during cell fate determination in a variety of species (Selkoe, 2000). Several lines of evidence have suggested roles for PS1 and PS2 genes in developmental, apoptotic signaling and in the regulation of proteolytic cleavage of the β-amyloid precursor protein (βAPP) (Levitan et al., 1995; Wong et al., 1997; Shen et al., 1997; Wolozin et al., 1996; De Strooper et al., 1998). For example, the PS1 gene is associated with migration defects in the central nervous system of PS1−/− mice (Hartmann et al., 1999; Handler et al., 2000). In addition, a mutation in βAPP (βAPP_(Ala713Val)) has been described in one family with a schizophrenia-like illness (Jones et al., 1992), further implicating the PS1/βAPP/Notch pathways in schizophrenia and related disorders. However, just how these putative functions are mediated, and how they relate to the abnormal metabolism of the βAPP associated with PS1 and PS2 mutations remains to be elucidated (Martin et al., 1995; Scheuner et al., 1996; Citron et al., 1997; Duff et al., 1996; Borchelt et al., 1996). The identification and cloning of normal as well as mutant PS 1 and PS2 genes and gene products are described in detail in co-pending commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 08/431,048, filed Apr. 28, 1995; Ser. No. 08/496,841, filed Jun. 28, 1995; Ser. No. 08/509,359, filed Jul. 31, 1995; and Ser. No. 08/592,541, filed Jan. 26, 1996, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

A new protein which specifically interacts with PS1 and PS2 has recently been discovered. This transmembrane protein, herein referred to as “Presenilin Associated Membrane Protein” or “PAMP”, is expressed in multiple tissues (e.g., brain, kidney, lung, etc.). PAMP is described in co-pending commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 09/541,094, filed Mar. 31, 2000, which is specifically incorporated herein by reference. The PAMP gene and gene product is implicated in the biochemical pathways affected in Alzheimer's Disease (AD), and may also have a role in other dementias, amyloid angiopathies, and developmental disorders such as spina bifida. Interestingly, the gene associated with inherited susceptibility to schizophrenia (see Brzustowicz, supra) also contains the PAMP gene (Yu et al, 2000).

A need exists for new methods and reagents to more accurately and effectively diagnose and treat schizophrenia as well as other neuropsychiatric, neurodevelopmental, and neurodegenerative diseases. In addition, further insights into PAMP and its interaction with PS proteins and other components may lead to new diagnostic and treatment methods for schizophrenia and other related CNS diseases.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides new uses of the PAMP gene, the product of the gene, and mutations and polymorphisms thereof in the study and treatment of a variety of neurological disorders, especially schizophrenia. Applicants have surprisingly discovered that PAMP plays a role in the development of schizophrenia. The PAMP gene and the product of the PAMP gene therefore present new therapeutic targets for the treatment of a variety of neurological disorders, especially schizophrenia. Moreover, the PAMP gene will be useful for generating animal and cellular models of schizophrenia.

Thus, PAMP nucleic acids, proteins and peptides, antibodies to PAMP, cells transformed with PAMP nucleic acids, and transgenic animals altered with PAMP nucleic acids that possess various utilities, are described herein for the diagnosis, therapy and continued investigation of neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders, especially schizophrenia. Furthermore, mutant PAMP nucleic acids, proteins, or peptides, cells transfected with vectors comprising mutant PAMP nucleic acids, transgenic animals expressing mutant PAMP or peptides thereof, and their use in studying neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders, especially schizophrenia, or developing improved diagnostic or therapeutic methods for such disorders, are presented herein.

The invention provides a method for detecting a mutation in PAMP associated with neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders, especially schizophrenia, comprising obtaining a nucleic acid sample from an individual diagnosed with or suspected of having schizophrenia or another neuropsychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorder, and sequencing a gene encoding PAMP from said sample. In particular, such methods can identify normal human alleles as well as mutant alleles of PAMP genes which are causative of or contribute to neuropsychiatric or neurodevelopmental diseases, especially schizophrenia.

The invention also provides a method for diagnosing individuals predisposed to or having a neuropsychiatric and/or neurodevelopmental disorder such as schizophrenia, comprising obtaining a nucleic acid sample from an individual diagnosed with or suspected of having such a disorder, and sequencing a gene encoding PAMP from said sample.

The invention also provides a method for diagnosing individuals predisposed to or having a neuropsychiatric and/or neurodevelopmental disorder such as schizophrenia, comprising obtaining cells that contain nucleic acid encoding PAMP, and under non-pathological conditions, transcribing the nucleic acid, and measuring a level of transcriptional activity of the nucleic acid.

The invention further provides a method for diagnosing individuals predisposed to or having a neuropsychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorder, especially schizophrenia, comprising obtaining cells from an individual that express nucleic acid encoding PAMP, and measuring PAMP activity. Alternatively, PAMP could be isolated from that individual to investigate, for example, whether the PAMP amino acid sequence is similar or different from wild-type PAMP, and/or whether PAMP expression levels differ from typical PAMP levels. In an alternative embodiment, the activity or abundance of a PAMP substrate may be measured.

The invention also provides a method for identifying putative agents that affect a neuropsychiatric and/or neurodevelopmental disorder, especially schizophrenia, comprising administering one or more putative agents to a transgenic animal and detecting a change in PAMP activity.

The invention also provides a method for identifying putative agents that affect a neuropsychiatric and/or neurodevelopmental disorder, especially schizophrenia, comprising adding one or more said agents to the reconstituted system described above, and detecting a change in PAMP activity.

The invention also provides a method for identifying putative agents that affect a neuropsychiatric and/or neurodevelopmental disorder, especially schizophrenia, comprising adding one or more said agents to the complex described above, and detecting a conformational change in PAMP.

The invention also provides a method for identifying proteins that interact with PAMP, comprising contacting a substance to the reconstituted system discussed above, and detecting a change in PAMP activity.

The invention also provides animal and cellular models of schizophrenia or related disorders that comprise a PAMP gene as a therapeutic target for the development of drugs which interact with PAMP, and thus may be useful in the treatment and prevention of schizophrenia or related disorders.

Further the invention provides for a method for identifying substances that modulate PAMP activity, comprising contacting a sample containing one or more substances with PAMP, or a PAMP mutant, or functional fragments thereof, and a PAMP substrate, measuring PAMP activity, and determining whether a change in PAMP activity occurs. In a preferred embodiment, the substance is a PAMP inhibitor. In another preferred embodiment, the substance stimulates PAMP activity.

These and other aspects of the invention are further elaborated in the Detailed Description of the Invention and Examples, infra.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A and 1B. Predicted amino acid sequences for human (SEQ ID NO: 14), mouse (SEQ ID NO: 16), D. melanogaster (SEQ ID NO:18) and C. elegans (SEQ ID NO: 12) PAMP orthologues.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

According to the invention, the PAMP gene and its product, the PAMP protein, present new therapeutic targets for the treatment of a variety of neurological disorders, especially schizophrenia. Provided herein are also new strategies to create animal and cellular models based on PAMP or PAMP mutants to study schizophrenia and potential treatment strategies. The invention also offers the potential for new diagnostic screening methods for schizophrenia, wherein the PAMP gene and PAMP protein are investigated.

PAMP

The invention is based, in part, on the discovery that the PAMP gene and the PAMP protein play critical roles in schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders. PAMP (“Presenilin Associated Membrane Protein”), is a novel Type I transmembrane protein that is closely involved in CNS development via its interactions with Notch processing, PS1, PS2 and with the α- and β-secretase derived fragments of βAPP. Multiple studies have indicated that defects in CNS development, such as defects in neuronal migration, are associated with schizophrenia, and PAMP is linked to this disorder through several lines of evidence, such as (1) the PAMP gene maps to the same location as the schizophrenia susceptibility gene, as described above; (2) PAMP interacts with PS1, which is associated with migration defects in the central nervous system in PS I−/− mice (see above); (3) PAMP is involved in the Notch signaling pathway, one gene locus of which (NOTCH4) is implicated in schizophrenia (see above); and (4) a mutation in βAPP is associated with a schizophrenia-like illness (see above). Therefore, PAMP can contribute to the development of schizophrenia via several routes, e.g., through mutations and/or polymorphisms in PAMP, variations in its expression levels, and defects in its interactions with other components in neural development and/or migration.

As referred to herein, “PAMP” means a native or mutant full-length protein, or fragments thereof, that interacts with the PAMP-interacting domain of a presenilin protein. PAMP is also known under the name “Nicastrin”. Human, murine, D. melanogaster and C. elegans orthologues are provided.

Experimental data indicate that PAMP, PS1, and PS2 exist in the same high molecular weight protein complex, and PAMP and PS1 are both co-localized to intracellular membranes in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. Abolition of functional expression of a C. elegans homologue of this protein leads to the development of notch-like developmental defects. This shows that PAMP is also intimately involved in the processing of not only βAPP, but also other molecules, such as Notch and its homologues. For example, PAMP can bind to membrane-bound Notch. From expressed sequence tags (EST) databases, it is apparent that, like PS1 and PS2, PAMP is expressed in multiple tissues.

Various structural features characterize PAMP (GenBank Accession No. Q92542; SEQ ID NO: 14). The nucleotide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 13) of human PAMP predicts that the gene encodes a Type 1 transmembrane protein of 709 amino acids (SEQ ID NO: 14), the protein having a short hydrophilic C-terminus (˜20 residues), a hydrophobic transmembrane domain (15-20 residues), and a longer N-terminal hydrophilic domain which contains several potentially functional sequence motifs as listed below in Table 1. The PAMP sequence also contains a Trp-Asp (WD) repeat (residue 226), at least one “DTG” motif (residues 91-93) present in eukaryotic aspartyl proteases, as well as several “TDTA/DTAE” motifs (residues 480-482, 504-506) present in viral aspartyl proteases. There are also four conserved cysteine residues in the N-terminal hydrophilic domain (Cys₁₉₅, Cys₂₁₃, Cys₂₃₀, and Cys₂₄₈ in human PAMP) having a periodocity of 16-17 residues, which may form a functional domain (e.g. a metal binding domain or disulfide bridge for tertiary structure stabilization). Subdomains of PAMP have weak homologies to a variety of peptidases. For example, residues 322-343, 361-405, and 451-466 have 46% (p=0.03) similarity to another hypothetical protein; C. elegans aminopeptidase hydrolase precursor signal antigen transmembrane receptor zinc glycoprotein (SWISS-PROT; see expasy.ch/sprot on the World-Wide Web (www); Accession No. Q93332). TABLE 1 Potential functional sequence motifs in PAMP (SEQ ID NO: 14). Potential function PAMP residue (amino acid sequence) N-asparaginyl glycosylation 45 (NKTA), 55 (NATH), 187 (NETK), 200 (NLSQ), 204 (NGSA), 264 (NTTG), 387 (NESV), 417 (NQSQ), 435 (NISG), 464 (NVSY), 506 (NFSD), 530 (NNSW), 562 (NTTY), 573 (NLTG), 580 (NLTR), 612 (NETD) Glycosaminoglycan attachment 404 (SGAG) Myristolation 5 (GGGSGA), 29 (GLCRGN), 61 (GCQSSI), 120 (GLAVSL), 146 (GVYSNS), 167 (GNGLAY), 205 (GSAPTF), 294 (GAESAV), 438 (GVVLAD), 446 (GAFHNK), 504 (GTNFSD), 576 (GTVVNL) Phosphorylation sites for cAMP- and 232 (RRSS) cGMP-dependent protein kinase Phosphorylation sites for protein 115 (TSR), 268 (TLK), 340 (SSR), 384 (SQK), kinase C 389 (SVR), 483 (TAK), 614 (TDR), 624 (TAR) Phosphorylation sites for casein 8 (SGAD), 280 (TRLD), 361 (SFVE), 372 (TSLE), kinase II 455 (SIYD), 466 (SYPE), 472 (SPEE), 641 (SSTE), 647 (TWTE)

The invention is further based on the identification of conserved functional domains, based on comparison and evaluation of the predicted amino acid sequences of human (SEQ ID NO: 14), murine (SEQ ID NO: 16), D. melanogaster (SEQ ID NO: 18), and C. elegans (SEQ ID NO: 12) orthologues of PAMP. “PAMP” can be characterized by the presence of conserved structural features, relative to orthologues from D. melanogaster and C. elegans. Nucleotide sequences encoding homologous hypothetical proteins exist in mice multiple EST, and C. elegans (GenBank; see ncbi.nlm.nih.gov on the World-Wide Web (www); Accession No. Z75 714; 37% similarity, p=8.7e⁻²⁶) (Wilson et al., 1994). These hypothetical murine and nematode proteins have a similar topology and contain similar functional motifs to human PAMP. The existence of such homology predicts that similar proteins will be detected in other species including Xenopus, and Zebra fish, to mention a few such possibilities. By comparing the predicted amino acid sequences of human (SEQ ID NO: 14), murine (SEQ ID NO: 16), D. melanogaster (SEQ ID NO: 18), and C. elegans (SEQ ID NO: 12) PAMP proteins, we have deduced a series of conserved functional domains. One domain has chemical similarities to cyclic nucleotide binding domains of other proteins, and may have some regulatory role on a potential complex formed between PS1:PAMP and the C-terminal fragment of βAPP, derived either from α- or β-secretase. These putative functional domains are sites for therapeutic target development by deploying drugs which might interact with these sites to modulate βAPP processing via this complex.

The term “PAMP” also refers to functionally active fragments of the protein. Such fragments include, but are not limited to, peptides that contain an epitope, e.g., as determined by conventional algorithms such as hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity analysis for antibody epitopes, and amphipathicity or consensus algorithms for T cell epitopes (Spouge et al., 1987; Margalit et al., 1987; Rothbard, 1986; Rothbard and Taylor, 1988). More preferably, a functionally active fragment of PAMP is a conserved domain, relative to the D. melanogaster and C. elegans orthologues. A specific functionally active fragment of PAMP is a fragment that interacts with PS1 or PS2, or both.

PAMP also encompasses naturally occurring variants, including other mammalian PAMPs (readily identified, as shown herein for murine PAMP, based on the presence of the structural features set forth above), allelic variants of PAMP from other human sources (including variants containing polymorphisms that are predictive of disease propensity or of response to pharmacological agents), and mutant forms of PAMP or PAMP genes that are associated with neurological diseases and disorders (such as spina bifida), particularly neuropsychiatric disorders (such as schizophrenia). Also included are artificial PAMP mutants created by standard techniques such as site directed mutagenesis or chemical synthesis.

A PAMP “substrate” may be a polypeptide or protein, or any other type of compound, with which PAMP interacts physiologically. Examples of PAMP substrates include PS1, PS2, and βAPP. Furthermore, A PAMP “ligand” may be a polypeptide, protein, lipid, carbohydrate, vitamin, mineral, amino acid, or any other type of compound which binds to PAMP Hypothetically, PAMP may function as a receptor which modulates PS1/PS2/βAPP processing in response to signal (ligand) dependent interactions with PAMP.

DEFINITIONS

In accordance with the present invention there may be employed conventional molecular biology, microbiology, and recombinant DNA techniques within the skill of the art. Such techniques are explained fully in the literature. See, e.g., Sambrook, Fritsch & Maniatis, 1989; Glover, 1985; M. J. Gait, 1984; Hames &Higgins, 1985; Hames & S. J. Higgins, 1984; Freshney, 1986; IRLPress, 1986; Perbal, 1984; Ausubel et al., 1994.

If appearing herein, the following terms shall have the definitions set out below.

“Neuropsychiatric disorders” or “diseases” include recognized variants of overt schizophrenia (e.g., paranoid, catatonic), other related psychoses such as schizoaffective, schizotypal, schizophreniform and delusional disorders, and personality disorders such as schizoid personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, and paranoid personality disorder (see definitions in DSM-III-R, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association; and Flaum et al., 1997).

The use of italics (e.g., PAMP) indicates a nucleic acid molecule (cDNA, mRNA, gene, etc.); normal text (e.g., PAMP) indicates the polypeptide or protein.

In a specific embodiment, the term “about” or “approximately” means within 20%, preferably within 10%, and more preferably within 5% of a given value or range. Alternatively, particularly in biological systems which are often responsive to order of magnitude changes, the term about means within an order of magnitude of a given value, preferably within a multiple of about 5-fold, and more preferably within a factor of about 2-fold of a given value.

As used herein, the term “isolated” means that the referenced material is free of components found in the natural environment in which the material is normally found. In particular, isolated biological material is free of cellular components. In the case of nucleic acid molecules, an isolated nucleic acid includes a PCR product, an isolated mRNA, a cDNA, or a restriction fragment. In another embodiment, an isolated nucleic acid is preferably excised from the chromosome in which it may be found, and more preferably is no longer joined to non-regulatory, non-coding regions, or to other genes, located upstream or downstream of the gene contained by the isolated nucleic acid molecule when found in the chromosome. In yet another embodiment, the isolated nucleic acid lacks one or more introns. Isolated nucleic acid molecules can be inserted into plasmids, cosmids, artificial chromosomes, and the like. Thus, in a specific embodiment, a recombinant nucleic acid is an isolated nucleic acid. An isolated protein may be associated with other proteins or nucleic acids, or both, with which it associates in the cell, or with cellular membranes if it is a membrane associated protein. An isolated organelle, cell, or tissue is removed from the anatomical site in which it is found in an organism. An isolated material may be, but need not be, purified.

The term “purified” as used herein refers to material that has been isolated under conditions that reduce or eliminate unrelated materials, i.e., contaminants. For example, a purified protein is preferably substantially free of other proteins or nucleic acids with which it is associated in a cell; a purified nucleic acid molecule is preferably substantially free of proteins or other unrelated nucleic acid molecules with which it can be found within a cell.

As used herein, the term “substantially free” is used operationally, in the context of analytical testing of the material. Preferably, purified material substantially free of contaminants is at least 50% pure; more preferably, at least 90% pure, and more preferably still at least 99% pure. Purity can be evaluated by chromatography, gel electrophoresis, immunoassay, composition analysis, biological assay, and other methods known in the art.

The term “host cell” means any cell of any organism that is selected, modified, transformed, grown, or used or manipulated in any way, for the production of a substance by the cell, for example the expression by the cell of a gene, a DNA or RNA sequence, a protein or an enzyme. Host cells can further be used for screening or functional assays, as described infra. A host cell has been “transfected” by exogenous or heterologous DNA when such DNA has been introduced inside the cell. A cell has been “transformed” by exogenous or heterologous DNA when the transfected DNA is expressed and effects a function or phenotype on the cell in which it is expressed. The term “expression system” means a host cell transformed by a compatible expression vector and cultured under suitable conditions e.g. for the expression of a protein coded for by foreign DNA carried by the vector and introduced to the host cell.

Proteins and polypeptides can be made in the host cell by expression of recombinant DNA. As used herein, the term “polypeptide” refers to an amino acid-based polymer, which can be encoded by a nucleic acid or prepared synthetically. Polypeptides can be proteins, protein fragments, chimeric proteins, etc. Generally, the term “protein” refers to a polypeptide expressed endogenously in a cell, e.g., the naturally occurring form (or forms) of the amino acid-based polymer.

A “coding sequence” or a sequence “encoding” an expression product, such as a RNA, polypeptide, protein, or enzyme, is a nucleotide sequence that, when expressed, results in the production of that RNA, polypeptide, protein, or enzyme, i.e., the nucleotide sequence encodes an amino acid sequence for that polypeptide, protein or enzyme. A coding sequence for a protein may include a start codon (usually ATG) and a stop codon.

The coding sequences herein may be flanked by natural regulatory (expression control) sequences, or may be associated with heterologous sequences, including promoters, internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) and other ribosome binding site sequences, enhancers, response elements, suppressors, signal sequences, polyadenylation sequences, introns, 5′- and 3′-non-coding regions, and the like. The nucleic acids may also be modified by many means known in the art. Non-limiting examples of such modifications include methylation, “caps”, substitution of one or more of the naturally occurring nucleotides with an analog, and internucleotide modifications.

The term “gene”, also called a “structural gene” means a DNA sequence that codes for or corresponds to a particular sequence of ribonucleic acids or amino acids which comprise all or part of one or more proteins, and may or may not include regulatory DNA sequences, such as promoter sequences, which determine for example the conditions under which the gene is expressed.

A “promoter sequence” is a DNA regulatory region capable of binding RNA polymerase in a cell and initiating transcription of a downstream (3′ direction) coding sequence. For purposes of defining the present invention, the promoter sequence is bounded at its 3′ terminus by the transcription initiation site and extends upstream (5′ direction) to include the minimum number of bases or elements necessary to initiate transcription at levels detectable above background.

A coding sequence is “under the control” or “operatively associated with” transcriptional and translational control sequences in a cell when RNA polymerase transcribes the coding sequence into mRNA, which then may be trans-RNA spliced (if it contains introns) and translated into the protein encoded by the coding sequence.

The terms “express” and “expression” mean allowing or causing the information in a gene or DNA sequence to become manifest, for example producing a protein by activating the cellular functions involved in transcription and translation of a corresponding gene or DNA sequence. A DNA sequence is expressed in or by a cell to form an “expression product” such as a protein. The expression product itself, e.g. the resulting protein, may also be said to be “expressed” by the cell.

The term “transfection” means the introduction of a foreign nucleic acid into a cell. The term “transformation” means the introduction of a “foreign” (i.e. extrinsic or extracellular) gene, DNA or RNA sequence to a host cell, so that the host cell will express the introduced gene or sequence to produce a desired substance, typically a protein or enzyme coded by the introduced gene or sequence. The introduced gene or sequence may also be called a “cloned”, “foreign”, or “heterologous” gene or sequence, and may include regulatory or control sequences used by a cell's genetic machinery. The gene or sequence may include nonfunctional sequences or sequences with no known function. A host cell that receives and expresses introduced DNA or RNA has been “transformed” and is a “transformant” or a “clone.” The DNA or RNA introduced to a host cell can come from any source, including cells of the same genus or species as the host cell, or cells of a different genus or species.

The terms “vector”, “cloning vector” and “expression vector” mean the vehicle by which a DNA or RNA sequence (e.g., a foreign gene) can be introduced into a host cell, so as to transform the host and promote expression (e.g., transcription and translation) of the introduced sequence. Vectors include plasmids, phages, viruses, etc. A “cassette” refers to a DNA coding sequence or segment of DNA that codes for an expression product that can be inserted into a vector at defined restriction sites. The cassette restriction sites are designed to ensure insertion of the cassette in the proper reading frame. Generally, foreign DNA is inserted at one or more restriction sites of the vector DNA, and then is carried by the vector into a host cell along with the transmissible vector DNA. A segment or sequence of DNA having inserted or added DNA, such as an expression vector, can also be called a “DNA construct.” Recombinant cloning vectors will often include one or more replication systems for cloning or expression, one or more markers for selection in the host, e.g. antibiotic resistance, and one or more expression cassettes.

A “knockout mammal” is a mammal (e.g., mouse) that contains within its genome a specific gene that has been inactivated by the method of gene targeting (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,195 and No. 5,616,491). A knockout mammal includes both a heterozygote knockout (i.e., one defective allele and one wild-type allele) and a homozygous mutant. Preparation of a knockout mammal requires first introducing a nucleic acid construct that will be used to suppress expression of a particular gene into an undifferentiated cell type termed an embryonic stem cell. This cell is then injected into a mammalian embryo. A mammalian embryo with an integrated cell is then implanted into a foster mother for the duration of gestation. Zhou, et al., 1995 describes PPCA knock-out mice. Knockout mice can be used to study defects in neurological development or neurodegenerative diseases. Disease phenotypes that develop can provide a platform for further drug discovery.

The term “knockout” refers to partial or complete suppression of the expression of at least a portion of a protein encoded by an endogenous DNA sequence in a cell. The term “knockout construct” refers to a nucleic acid sequence that is designed to decrease or suppress expression of a protein encoded by endogenous DNA sequences in a cell. The nucleic acid sequence used as the knockout construct is typically comprised of (1) DNA from some portion of the gene (exon sequence, intron sequence, and/or promoter sequence) to be suppressed and (2) a marker sequence used to detect the presence of the knockout construct in the cell. The knockout construct is inserted into a cell, and integrates with the genomic DNA of the cell in such a position so as to prevent or interrupt transcription of the native DNA sequence. Such insertion usually occurs by homologous recombination (i.e., regions of the knockout construct that are homologous to endogenous DNA sequences hybridize to each other when the knockout construct is inserted into the cell and recombine so that the knockout construct is incorporated into the corresponding position of the endogenous DNA). The knockout construct nucleic acid sequence may comprise 1) a full or partial sequence of one or more exons and/or introns of the gene to be suppressed, 2) a full or partial promoter sequence of the gene to be suppressed, or 3) combinations thereof. Typically, the knockout construct is inserted into an embryonic stem cell (ES cell) and is integrated into the ES cell genomic DNA, usually by the process of homologous recombination. This ES cell is then injected into, and integrates with, the developing embryo.

Generally, for homologous recombination, the DNA will be at least about 1 kilobase (kb) in length and preferably 3-4 kb in length, thereby providing sufficient complementary sequence for recombination when the knockout construct is introduced into the genomic DNA of the ES cell.

A “knock-in” mammal is a mammal in which an endogenous gene is substituted with a heterologous gene or a modified variant of the endogenous gene (Roemer et al., 1991). Preferably, the heterologous gene is “knocked-in” to a locus of interest, for example into a gene that is the subject of evaluation of expression or function, thereby linking the heterologous gene expression to transcription from the appropriate promoter (in which case the gene may be a reporter gene; see Elefanty et al., 1998). This can be achieved by homologous recombination, transposon (Westphal and Leder, 1997), using mutant recombination sites (Araki et al., 1997) or PCR (Zhang and Henderson, 1998).

The phrases “disruption of the gene” and “gene disruption” refer to insertion of a nucleic acid sequence into one region of the native DNA sequence (usually one or more exons) and/or the promoter region of a gene so as to decrease or prevent expression of that gene in the cell as compared to the wild-type or naturally occurring sequence of the gene. By way of example, a nucleic acid construct can be prepared containing a DNA sequence encoding an antibiotic resistance gene which is inserted into the DNA sequence that is complementary to the DNA sequence (promoter and/or coding region) to be disrupted. When this nucleic acid construct is then transfected into a cell, the construct will integrate into the genomic DNA. Thus, some progeny of the cell will no longer express the gene, or will express it at a decreased level, as the DNA is now disrupted by the antibiotic resistance gene.

The term “heterologous” refers to a combination of elements not naturally occurring. For example, heterologous DNA refers to DNA not naturally located in the cell, or in a chromosomal site of the cell. Preferably, the heterologous DNA includes a gene foreign to the cell. A heterologous expression regulatory element is a such an element operatively associated with a different gene than the one it is operatively associated with in nature. In the context of the present invention, an gene is heterologous to the recombinant vector DNA in which it is inserted for cloning or expression, and it is heterologous to a host cell containing such a vector, in which it is expressed, e.g., a CHO cell.

The terms “mutant” and “mutation” mean any detectable change in genetic material, e.g. DNA, or any process, mechanism, or result of such a change. This includes gene mutations, in which the structure (e.g., DNA sequence) of a gene is altered, any gene or DNA arising from any mutation process, and any expression product (e.g., protein) expressed by a modified gene or DNA sequence. The term “variant” may also be used to indicate a modified or altered gene, DNA sequence, enzyme, cell, etc., i.e., any kind of mutant.

“Sequence-conservative variants” of a polynucleotide sequence are those in which a change of one or more nucleotides in a given codon position results in no alteration in the amino acid encoded at that position.

“Function-conservative variants” are those in which a given amino acid residue in a protein or enzyme has been changed without altering the overall conformation and function of the polypeptide, including, but not limited to, replacement of an amino acid with one having similar properties (such as, for example, polarity, hydrogen bonding potential, acidic, basic, hydrophobic, aromatic, and the like). Amino acids with similar properties are well known in the art. For example, arginine, histidine and lysine are hydrophilic-basic amino acids and may be interchangeable. Similarly, isoleucine, a hydrophobic amino acid, may be replaced with leucine, methionine or valine. Such changes are expected to have little or no effect on the apparent molecular weight or isoelectric point of the protein or polypeptide. Amino acids other than those indicated as conserved may differ in a protein or enzyme so that the percent protein or amino acid sequence similarity between any two proteins of similar function may vary and may be, for example, from 70% to 99% as determined according to an alignment scheme such as by the Cluster Method, wherein similarity is based on the MEGALIGN algorithm. A “function-conservative variant” also includes a polypeptide or enzyme which has at least 60% amino acid identity as determined by BLAST (Altschul, et al., 1990) or FASTA algorithms, preferably at least 75%, most preferably at least 85%, and even more preferably at least 90%, and which has the same or substantially similar properties or functions as the native or parent protein or enzyme to which it is compared.

An “ortholog” to a protein means a corresponding protein from another species. Orthologous proteins typically have similar functions in different species, and can also be substantially homologous.

As used herein, the term “homologous” in all its grammatical forms and spelling variations refers to the relationship between proteins that possess a “common evolutionary origin,” including proteins from superfamilies (e.g., the immunoglobulin superfamily) and homologous proteins from different species (e.g., myosin light chain, etc.) (Reeck et al., 1987). Such proteins (and their encoding genes) have sequence homology, as reflected by their sequence similarity, whether in terms of percent similarity or the presence of specific residues or motifs. Motif analysis can be performed using, for example, the program BLOCKS (blocks.fhcrc.org on the World-Wide Web).

Accordingly, the term “sequence similarity” in all its grammatical forms refers to the degree of identity or correspondence between nucleic acid or amino acid sequences of proteins that may or may not share a common evolutionary origin (see Reeck et al., supra). However, in common usage and in the instant application, the term “homologous,” when modified with an adverb such as “highly,” may refer to sequence similarity and may or may not relate to a common evolutionary origin.

In a specific embodiment, two DNA sequences are “substantially homologous” or “substantially similar” when at least about 80%, and most preferably at least about 90 or 95% of the nucleotides match over the defined length of the DNA sequences, as determined by sequence comparison algorithms, such as BLAST, FASTA, DNA Strider, etc. Sequences that are substantially homologous can be identified by comparing the sequences using standard software available in sequence data banks, or in a Southern hybridization experiment under, for example, stringent conditions as defined for that particular system.

Similarly, in a particular embodiment, two amino acid sequences are “substantially homologous” or “substantially similar” when greater than 80% of the amino acids are identical, or greater than about 90% are similar (functionally identical). Preferably, the similar or homologous sequences are identified by alignment using, for example, the GCG (Genetics Computer Group, Program Manual for the GCG Package, Version 7, Madison, Wis.) pileup program, ProteinPredict (dodo.cmpc.columbia.edu/predictprotein on the World-Wide Web), or any of the programs described above (BLAST, FASTA, etc.).

A nucleic acid molecule is “hybridizable” to another nucleic acid molecule, such as a cDNA, genomic DNA, or RNA, when a single stranded form of the nucleic acid molecule can anneal to the other nucleic acid molecule under the appropriate conditions of temperature and solution ionic strenght (see Sambrook et al., supra). The conditions of temperature and ionic strength determine the “stringency” of the hybridization. For preliminary screening for homologous nucleic acids, low stringency hybridization conditions, corresponding to a T_(m) (melting temperature) of 55° C., can be used. Moderate stringency hybridization conditions correspond to a higher T_(m) and high stringency hybridization conditions correspond to the highest T_(m). Hybridization requires that the two nucleic acids contain complementary sequences, although depending on the stringency of the hybridization, mismatches between bases are possible. The appropriate stringency for hybridizing nucleic acids depends on the length of the nucleic acids and the degree of complementation, variables well known in the art. The greater the degree of similarity or homology between two nucleotide sequences, the greater the value of T_(m) for hybrids of nucleic acids having those sequences. The relative stability (corresponding to higher T_(m)) of nucleic acid hybridizations decreases in the following order: RNA:RNA, DNA:RNA, DNA:DNA. For hybrids of greater than 100 nucleotides in length, equations for calculating T_(m) have been derived (see Sambrook et al., supra, 9.50-9.51). For hybridization with shorter nucleic acids, i.e., oligonucleotides, the position of mismatches becomes more important, and the length of the oligonucleotide determines its specificity (see Sambrook et al., supra, 11.7-11.8). A minimum length for a hybridizable nucleic acid is at least about 10 nucleotides; preferably at least about 15 nucleotides; and more preferably the length is at least about 20 nucleotides.

The present invention provides antisense nucleic acids (including ribozymes), which may be used to inhibit expression of PAMP, e.g., to disrupt a cellular process (such disruption can be used in an animal model or therapeutically). An “antisense nucleic acid” is a single stranded nucleic acid molecule which, on hybridizing under cytoplasmic conditions with complementary bases in an RNA or DNA molecule, inhibits the latter's role. If the RNA is a messenger RNA transcript, the antisense nucleic acid is a counter transcript or mRNA-interfering complementary nucleic acid. As presently used, “antisense” broadly includes RNA-RNA interactions, RNA-DNA interactions, ribozymes and RNase-H mediated arrest. Antisense nucleic acid molecules can be encoded by a recombinant gene for expression in a cell (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,500; U.S. Pat. No. 5,811,234), or alternatively they can be prepared synthetically (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,607).

As used herein, the term “oligonucleotide” refers to a nucleic acid, generally of at least 10, preferably at least 15, and more preferably at least 20 nucleotides, preferably no more than 100 nucleotides, that is hybridizable to a genomic DNA molecule, a cDNA molecule, or an mRNA molecule encoding a gene, mRNA, cDNA, or other nucleic acid of interest. Oligonucleotides can be labeled, e.g., with ³²P-nucleotides or nucleotides to which a label, such as biotin, has been covalently conjugated. In one embodiment, a labeled oligonucleotide can be used as a probe to detect the presence of a nucleic acid. In another embodiment, oligonucleotides (one or both of which may be labeled) can be used as PCR primers, e.g. for cloning full length or a fragment of a protein or polypeptide. In a further embodiment, an oligonucleotide of the invention can form a triple helix with a nucleic acid (genomic DNA or mRNA) encoding a protein or polypeptide. Generally, oligonucleotides are prepared synthetically, preferably on a nucleic acid synthesizer. Accordingly, oligonucleotides can be prepared with non-naturally occurring phosphoester analog bonds, such as thioester bonds, etc. Furthermore, the oligonucleotides herein may also be modified with a label capable of providing a detectable signal, either directly or indirectly. Exemplary labels include radioisotopes, fluorescent molecules, biotin, and the like.

Specific non-limiting examples of synthetic oligonucleotides envisioned for this invention include oligonucleotides that contain phosphorothioates, phosphotriesters, methyl phosphonates, short chain alkyl, or cycloalkl intersugar linkages or short chain heteroatomic or heterocyclic intersugar linkages. Most preferred are those with CH₂—NH—O—CH₂, CH₂—N(CH₃)—O—CH₂, CH₂—O—N(CH₃)—CH₂, CH₂—N(CH₃)—N(CH₃)—CH₂ and O—N(CH₃)—CH₂—CH₂ backbones (where phosphodiester is O—PO₂—O—CH₂). U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,437 describes heteroaromatic olignucleotide linkages. Nitrogen linkers or groups containing nitrogen can also be used to prepare oligonucleotide mimics (U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,844 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,682). U.S. Pat. No. 5,637,684 describes phosphoramidate and phosphorothioamidate oligomeric compounds. Also envisioned are oligonucleotides having morpholino backbone structures (U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506). In other embodiments, such as the peptide-nucleic acid (PNA) backbone, the phosphodiester backbone of the oligonucleotide may be replaced with a polyamide backbone, the bases being bound directly or indirectly to the aza nitrogen atoms of the polyamide backbone (Nielsen et al., 1991). Other synthetic oligonucleotides may contain substituted sugar moieties comprising one of the following at the 2′ position: OH, SH, SCH₃, F, OCN, O(CH₂)_(n)NH₂ or O(CH₂)_(n)CH₃ where n is from 1 to about 10; C₁ to C₁₀ lower alkyl, substituted lower alkyl, alkaryl or aralkyl; Cl; Br; CN; CF₃; OCF₃; O—; S-, or N-alkyl; O-, S-, or N-alkenyl; SOCH₃; SO₂CH₃; ONO₂; NO₂; N₃; NH₂; heterocycloalkyl; heterocycloalkaryl; aminoalkylamino; polyalkylamino; substituted silyl; a fluorescein moiety; an RNA cleaving group; a reporter group; an intercalator; a group for improving the pharmacokinetic properties of an oligonucleotide; or a group for improving the pharmacodynamic properties of an oligonucleotide, and other substituents having similar properties. Oligonucleotides may also have sugar mimetics such as cyclobutyls or other carbocyclics in place of the pentofuranosyl group. Nucleotide units having nucleosides other than adenosine, cytidine, guanosine, thymidine and uridine, such as inosine, may be used in an oligonucleotide molecule.

Presenilins

The presenilin genes (PS1-PS1 and PS2-PS2) encode homologous polytopic transmembrane proteins that are expressed at low levels in intracellular membranes including the nuclear envelope, the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi apparatus and some as yet uncharacterized intracytoplasmic vesicles in many different cell types including neuronal and non-neuronal cells (see U.S. application Ser. No. 08/431,048, filed Apr. 28, 1995; 08/496,841, filed Jun. 28, 1995; and 08/509,359, filed Jul. 31, 1995; PCT Publication No. WO 96/34099, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,986,054, 5,040,540, and 6,020,143, the disclosures of which are specifically incorporated herein by reference; Sherrington et al., 1995; Rogaev et al., 1995; Levy-Lahad et al., 1995; Doan et al., 1996; Walter et al., 1996; De Strooper et al., 1997; Lehmann et al., 1997; Li et al., 1997). Structural studies predict that the presenilins contain between six and eight transmembrane (TM) domains organized such that the N-terminus, the C-terminus, and a large hydrophilic loop following the sixth TM domain are located in the cytoplasm or nucleoplasm, while the hydrophilic loop between TM1 and TM2 is located within the lumen of membranous intracellular organelles (Doan et al., 1996; De Strooper et al., 1997; Lehmann et al., 1997).

Presenilin Interacting Proteins

Proteins that interact with the presenilins, i.e., PS-interacting-protein elude PAMP, the S5a subunit of the 26S proteasome (GenBank; Accession No. U51007), Rab11 (GenBank; Accession Nos. X56740 and X53143), retinoid X receptor B, also known as nuclear receptor co-regulator or MHC (GenBank Accession Nos. M84820, and X63522), GT24 (GenBank Accession No. U81004), β-catenin (Zhou et al., 1997, and Yu et al., supra) as well as armadillo proteins. These and other PS1 binding proteins are described in Applicants' copending commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 08/888,077, filed Jul. 3, 1997, as well as U.S. application Ser. No. 08/592,541, filed Jan. 26, 1996, and U.S. application Ser. No. 09/541,094, filed Mar. 31, 2000, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

PS1 and PS2 interact specifically with at least two members of the armadillo family of proteins; neuronal plakophilin-related armadillo protein (Paffenholtz et al., 1997; Paffenholtz et al., 1999; Zhou et al. (2), 1997) and β-catenin, that are expressed in both embryonic and post-natal tissues. Moreover, the domains of PS1 and PS2 that interact with these proteins have been identified. Mutations in PS1 and PS2 affect the translocation of β-catenin into the nucleus of both native cells and cells transfected with a mutant PS gene. These interactions and effects are described in detail in co-pending commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 09/227,725, filed Jan. 8, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

The methods of the present invention are not limited to mutant presenilins wherein the PAMP-interacting domain is mutated relative to the wild-type protein. For example, Applicants have observed that mutations in PS1 (e.g., M146L) outside of the interacting domain (loop) also affect β-catenin translocation. These mutations probably disturb the presenilin armadillo interactions by altering the function of a high MW complex which contains, e.g., the presenilin and armadillo proteins, as described in Yu et al., 1998. Moreover, a comparison of the human PS1 (hPS1) and PS2 (hPS2) sequences reveals that these pathogenic mutations are in regions of the PS1 protein which are conserved in the PS2 protein. Therefore, corresponding mutations in corresponding regions of PS2 may also be expected to be pathogenic and are useful in the methods described herein.

PAMP Mutants

Mutant PS1 and PS2 genes, and their corresponding amino acid sequences are described in Applicants' co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 08/888,077, filed Jul. 3, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference. Examples of PS1 mutations include I143T, M146L, L171P, F177S, A260V, C263R, P264L, P267S, E280A, E280G, A285V, L286V, A291-319, L322V, G384A, L392V, C410Y and I439V. Examples of PS2 mutations include N141I, M239V and I420T.

PAMP mutants may cause biochemical changes similar to those affecting the onset or progression of schizophrenia. Therefore, artificial PAMP mutations can potentially be used to generate cellular and other model systems to design treatments and preventive strategies for schizophrenia and related disorders. Such mutations may also be used for evaluating whether PAMP is involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Since the amyloid-β (Aβ) inducing mutations are found in amino acid residues of a soluble (non-membrane spanning) domain of PAMP, analysis of the normal structure of this domain and the effects of these and other nearby mutations on the structure of this domain (and the other domains of PAMP) provide information for the design of specific molecular therapeutics.

In general, modifications of the sequences encoding the polypeptides described herein may be readily accomplished by standard techniques such as chemical syntheses and site-directed mutagenesis. See Gillman et al., 1979; Roberts et al., 1987; and Innis, 1990. Most modifications are evaluated by routine screening via an assay designed to select for the desired property.

Antibodies to PAMP

According to the invention, PAMP polypeptides produced recombinantly or by chemical synthesis, and fragments or other derivatives or analogs thereof, including fusion proteins and PAMP mutants, may be used as an immunogen to generate antibodies that recognize the PAMP polypeptide. Such antibodies include but are not limited to polyclonal, monoclonal, chimeric, single chain, Fab fragments, and an Fab expression library. Such an antibody is preferably specific for human PAMP, PAMP originating from other species, or for post-translationally modified (e.g. phosphorylated, glycosylated) PAMP.

Various procedures known in the art may be used for the production of polyclonal antibodies to PAMP polypeptide or derivative or analog thereof. For the production of antibody, various host animals can be immunized by injection with the PAMP polypeptide, or a derivative (e.g., fragment or fusion protein) thereof, including but not limited to rabbits, mice, rats, sheep, goats, etc. In one embodiment, the PAMP polypeptide or fragment thereof can be conjugated to an immunogenic carrier, e.g., bovine serum albumin (BSA) or keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). Various adjuvants may be used to increase the immunological response, depending on the host species, including but not limited to Freund's (complete and incomplete), mineral gels such as aluminum hydroxide, surface active substances such as lysolecithin, pluronic polyols, polyanions, peptides, oil emulsions, keyhole limpet hemocyanins, dinitrophenol, and potentially useful human adjuvants such as BCG (bacille Calmette-Guerin) and Corynebacterium parvum. Antisera may be collected at a chosen time point after immunization, and purified as desired.

For preparation of monoclonal antibodies directed toward the PAMP polypeptide, or fragment, analog, or derivative thereof, any technique that provides for the production of antibody molecules by continuous cell lines in culture may be used. These include but are not limited to the hybridoma technique originally developed by Köhler and Milstein, 1975, as well as the trioma technique, the human B-cell hybridoma technique (Kozbor et al., 1983; Cote et al., 1983), and the EBV-hybridoma technique to produce human monoclonal antibodies (Cole et al., 1985). Production of human antibodies by CDR grafting is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,585,089, 5,693,761, and 5,693,762 to Queen et al., and also in U.S. Pat. No. 5,225,539 to Winter and International Patent Application PCT/WO91/09967 by Adau et al. In an additional embodiment of the invention, monoclonal antibodies can be produced in germ-free animals (International Patent Publication No. WO 89/12690, published 28 Dec. 1989). In fact, according to the invention, techniques developed for the production of “chimeric antibodies” (Morrison et al., 1984); Neuberger et al., 1984; Takeda et al., 1985) by splicing the genes from a mouse antibody molecule specific for an PAMP polypeptide together with genes from a human antibody molecule of appropriate biological activity can be used; such antibodies are within the scope of this invention. Such human or humanized chimeric antibodies are preferred for use in therapy of human diseases or disorders (described infra), since the human or humanized antibodies are much less likely than xenogenic antibodies to induce an immune response, in particular an allergic response, themselves.

According to the invention, techniques described for the production of single chain antibodies (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,476,786 and 5,132,405 to Huston; U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,778) can be adapted to produce PAMP polypeptide-specific single chain antibodies. An additional embodiment of the invention utilizes the techniques described for the construction of Fab expression libraries (Huse et al., 1989) to allow rapid and easy identification of monoclonal Fab fragments with the desired specificity for an PAMP polypeptide, or its derivatives, or analogs.

Antibody fragments which contain the idiotype of the antibody molecule can be generated by known techniques. For example, such fragments include but are not limited to: the F(ab′)₂ fragment which can be produced by pepsin digestion of the antibody molecule; the Fab′ fragments which can be generated by reducing the disulfide bridges of the F(ab′)₂ fragment, and the Fab fragments which can be generated by treating the antibody molecule with papain and a reducing agent.

In the production of antibodies, screening for the desired antibody can be accomplished by techniques known in the art, e.g., radioimmunoassay, ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), “sandwich” immunoassays, immunoradiometric assays, gel diffusion precipitin reactions, immunodiffusion assays, in situ immunoassays (using colloidal gold, enzyme or radioisotope labels, for example), western blots, precipitation reactions, agglutination assays (e.g., gel agglutination assays, hemagglutination assays), complement fixation assays, immunofluorescence assays, protein A assays, and immunoelectrophoresis assays, etc. In one embodiment, antibody binding is detected by detecting a label on the primary antibody. In another embodiment, the primary antibody is detected by detecting binding of a secondary antibody or reagent to the primary antibody. In a further embodiment, the secondary antibody is labeled. Many means are known in the art for detecting binding in an immunoassay and are within the scope of the present invention. For example, to select antibodies which recognize a specific epitope of an PAMP polypeptide, one may assay generated hybridomas for a product which binds to an PAMP polypeptide fragment containing such epitope. For selection of an antibody specific to an PAMP polypeptide from a particular species of animal, one can select on the basis of positive binding with PAMP polypeptide expressed by or isolated from cells of that species of animal.

The foregoing antibodies can be used in methods known in the art relating to the localization and activity of the PAMP polypeptide, e.g., for Western blotting, imaging PAMP polypeptide in situ, measuring levels thereof in appropriate physiological samples, etc. using any of the detection techniques mentioned above or known in the art. Such antibodies can be used to identify proteins that interact with PAMP, and to detect conformational or structural changes in PAMP.

In a specific embodiment, antibodies that agonize or antagonize the activity of PAMP polypeptide can be generated. They can also be used to regulate or inhibit PAMP activity intracellular, i.e., the invention contemplates an intracellular antibody (intrabody), e.g., single chain Fv antibodies (see generally, Chen, 1997; Spitz et al., 1996; Indolfi et al., 1996; Kijima et al., 1995).

PAMP Diagnostic Assays

The nucleotide sequence and the protein sequence and the putative biological activity of PAMP or PAMP mutants can all be used for the purposes of diagnosis of individuals who are at-risk for, or who actually have, a variety of neurodegenerative diseases (including Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body variant, Parkinson's disease-dementia complex, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis etc.), neuropsychiatric diseases (schizophrenia, depression, mild cognitive impairment, benign senescent forgetfulness, age-associated memory loss, etc.), neurodevelopmental disorders associated with defects in intracellular signal transduction mediated by factors such as Notch, Delta, Wingless, etc., and neoplasms (e.g., bowel cancer, etc.) associated with abnormalities of PS1/PAMP/PS2 mediated regulation of cell death pathways. These diagnostic entities can be used by searching for alterations in: the nucleotide sequence of PAMP; in the transcriptional activity of PAMP; in the protein level as monitored by immunological means (e.g. ELISA and Western blots); in the amino acid sequence (as ascertained by Western blotting, amino acid sequence analysis, mass spectroscopy); and/or in the biological activity of the PAMP protein as measured by either in vivo methods (e.g., monitoring βAPP processing and the production of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ), or other suitable protein substrates for PAMP including Notch, etc.), or by in vitro assays (using either whole cell or cell-free assays to measure processing of suitable substrate including βAPP or parts thereof, and other proteins such as Notch). Any of these assays can also be performed in a transgenic animal model as well, e.g., to measure the effect of a drug or a mutation or overexpression of a different gene in vivo.

PAMP Screening Assays

Identification and isolation of PAMP provides for development of screening assays, particularly for high throughput screening of molecules that up- or down-regulate the activity of PAMP, e.g., by permitting expression of PAMP in quantities greater than can be isolated from natural sources, or in indicator cells that are specially engineered to indicate the activity of PAMP expressed after transfection or transformation of the cells. Any screening technique known in the art can be used to screen for PAMP agonists or antagonists. The present invention contemplates screens for small molecule ligands or ligand analogs and mimics, as well as screens for natural ligands that bind to and agonize or antagonize the activity of PAMP in vivo. For example, natural products libraries can be screened using assays of the invention for molecules that agonize or antagonize PAMP activity.

Another approach uses recombinant bacteriophage to produce large libraries. Using the “phage method” (Scott and Smith, 1990; Cwirla, et al, 1990; Devlin et al., 1990), very large libraries can be constructed (10⁶-10⁸ chemical entities). A second approach uses primarily chemical methods, of which the Geysen method (Geysen et al., 1986; Geysen et al., 1987; and the method of Fodor et al. (1991) are examples. Furka et al., 1988, Furka, 1991, Houghton (U.S. Pat. No. 4,631,211) and Rutter et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,010,175) describe methods to produce a mixture of peptides that can be tested as agonists or antagonists.

In another aspect, synthetic libraries (Needels et al., 1993; Ohlmeyer et al., 1993; Lam et al., WO 92/00252; Kocis et al., WO 9428028) and the like can be used to screen for PAMP ligands according to the present invention.

Knowledge of the primary sequence of the protein, and the similarity of that sequence with proteins of known function, can provide an initial clue as to the inhibitors or antagonists of the protein. As noted above, identification and screening of antagonists is further facilitated by determining structural features of the protein, e.g., using X-ray crystallography, neutron diffraction, nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometry, and other techniques for structure determination. These techniques provide for the rational design or identification of agonists and antagonists.

The PAMP protein sequence (including parts thereof) can be used to deduce the structural organization and topology of PAMP through the use of a variety of techniques including CD spectroscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography, and molecular modeling. Sequences for PAMP or PAMP mutants can also be used to identify proteins which interact with PAMP either in concert with PS1 and PS2, or independently, using a variety of methods including co-immunoprecipitation, yeast two hybrid interaction trap assays, yeast three hybrid interaction trap assays, chemical cross-linking and co-precipitation studies, etc. These and other methods are described more fully in co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 08/888,077, filed Jul. 3, 1997, and 09/227,725, filed Jan. 8, 1999, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Identification of these interacting partners will then lead to their use to further delineate the biochemical pathways leading to the above-mentioned diseases.

Finally, the structural analysis of PAMP, when combined with structural analysis of PS1 and PS2, and other proteins which interact with PAMP or PAMP mutants, will identify the structural domains that mediate interactions between these molecules and which also confer biological activity on PAMP (or PAMP and these other molecules). These structural domains, and other functional domains, which can modulate the activity of these structural domains, can all be modified through a variety of means, including but not limited to site-directed mutagenesis, in order to either augment or reduce the biological activity. The structure and topology of these domains can all be used as a basis for the rational design of pharmaceuticals (small molecule conventional drugs or novel carbohydrate, lipid, DNA/RNA or protein-based high molecular weight biological compounds) to modulate (increase or decrease) the activity of PAMP and/or the PAMP PS1/PS2 complex, and/or the activity of the PAMP/other protein complexes. For example, using structural prediction calculations, possibly in conjunction with spectroscopic data like nuclear magnetic resonance, circular dichroism, and other physical-chemical structural data, or crystallographic data, or both, one can generate molecular models for the structure of PAMP. These models, in turn, are important for rational drug design. Drug candidates generated using a rational drug design program can then be applied for the treatment and/or prevention of the above-mentioned diseases, and can be administered through a variety of means including: as conventional small molecules through enteral or parenteral routes; via inclusion in liposome vehicles; through infusion in pumps inserted into various organs (e.g., via Omaya pumps inserted into the cerebral ventricles); via the transplantation of genetically-modified cells expressing recombinant genes; or via the use of biological vectors (e.g., retrovirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, Lentivirus, or herpes simplex virus-based vectors) which allow targeted expression of appropriately modified gene products in selected cell types. It should be noted that the recombinant proteins described above may be the wild-type PAMP, a genetically-modified PAMP, a wild-type PS1/PS2, a genetically-modified PS1/PS2, or a specially-designed protein or peptide which is designed to interact with either the functional domains of PAMP (or the PAMP/PS 1/PS2/other protein complex) or to interact with the domains which modulate the activity of the functional domains of PAMP.

PAMP In Vitro and In Vivo Models

The PAMP nucleotide sequence can be used to make cell-free systems, transfected cell lines, and animal models (invertebrate or vertebrate) of the neurodegenerative and other diseases outlined above. These animal and cell models may involve over-expression of all or part of PAMP or PAMP mutants, e.g., as mini-gene cDNA transgene constructs under the regulation of suitable promoter elements carried in vectors such as cos-Tet for transgenic mice and pcDNA (Invitrogen, California) in transfected cell lines. Animal and cellular models can also be generated by via homologous recombination mediated targeting of the endogenous gene to create artificially mutant sequences (knock-in gene targeting); or loss of function mutations (knock-out gene targeting); by translocation of P-elements; and by chemical mutagenesis. Animal, cellular and cell-free model systems can be used for a variety of purposes including the discovery of diagnostics and therapeutics for this disease.

Included within the scope of this invention is a mammal in which two or more genes have been knocked out or knocked in, or both. Such mammals can be generated by repeating the procedures set forth herein for generating each knockout construct, or by breeding to mammals, each with a single gene knocked out, to each other, and screening for those with the double knockout genotype.

Regulated knockout animals can be prepared using various systems, such as the tet-repressor system (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,654,168) or the Cre-Lox system (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,317 and No. 5,801,030).

Transgenic mammals can be prepared for evaluating the molecular mechanisms of PAMP, and particularly human PAMP function. Such mammals provide excellent models for screening or testing drug candidates. It is possible to evaluate compounds or diseases on “knockout” animals, e.g., to identify a compound that can compensate for a defect in PAMP activity. Alternatively, PAMP (or mutant PAMP), alone or in combination with βAPP, PS1, PS2, and/or Notch, or some other component (double or triple transgenics) “knock-in” mammals can be prepared for evaluating the molecular biology of this system in greater detail than is possible with human subjects. Both technologies permit manipulation of single units of genetic information in their natural position in a cell genome and to examine the results of that manipulation in the background of a terminally differentiated organism. These animals can be evaluated for levels of mRNA or protein expression, processing of βAPP, or development of a condition indicative of inappropriate gene expression, e.g., Notch phenotype or another phenotype as set forth above, or neurodegeneration, including cognitive deficits, learning or memory deficits, or neuromuscular deficits.

Various transgenic animal systems have been developed. Mice, rats, hamsters, and other rodents are popular, particularly for drug testing, because large numbers of transgenic animals can be bred economically and rapidly. Larger animals, including sheep, goats, pigs, and cows, have been made transgenic as well. Transgenic D. melanogaster and C. elegans can also be made and, using known genetic methods, may offer the ability to identify upstream and downstream modifiers of a PAMP phenotype. Transgenic animals can also be prepared by introducing the transgene on a vector; such animals, which are not modified in the germ line and are only transiently transgenic, naturally cannot pass along the genetic information to their progeny.

In another series of embodiments, transgenic animals are created in which (i) a human PAMP, or a mutant human PAMP, is stably inserted into the genome of the transgenic animal; and/or (ii) the endogenous PAMP genes are inactivated and replaced with their human counterparts. See, e.g., Coffman, 1997; Esther et al., 1996; Murakami et al, 1996. Such animals can be treated with candidate compounds and monitored for the effects of such drugs on PAMP cavity.

PAMP Gene Therapy

As discussed above, abnormalities in PAMP expression and/or interactions with PS1/PS2/βAPP are associated with severe neurological deficits. Thus, the present invention provides for treatment of such deficits either with a drug discovered using a screening assay or transgenic animal model, or both, as set forth above, or by replacing a defective PAMP gene with a functional gene by gene therapy.

A gene encoding PAMP, a PAMP mutant, or alternatively a negative regulator of PAMP such as an antisense nucleic acid, intracellular antibody (intrabody), or dominant negative PAMP (which may be truncated), can be introduced in vivo, ex vivo, or in vitro using a viral or a non-viral vector, e.g., as discussed above. Expression in targeted tissues can be effected by targeting the transgenic vector to specific cells, such as with a viral vector or a receptor ligand, or by using a tissue-specific promoter, or both. Targeted gene delivery is described in WO 95/28494, published October 1995.

Preferably, for in vivo administration, an appropriate immunosuppressive treatment is employed in conjunction with the viral vector, e.g., adenovirus vector, to avoid immuno-deactivation of the viral vector and transfected cells. For example, immunosuppressive cytokines, such as interleukin 12 (IL 12), interferon-γ (IFNγ), or anti-CD4 antibody, can be administered to block humoral or cellular immune responses to the viral vectors (see, e.g., Wilson, 1995). In that regard, it is advantageous to employ a viral vector that is engineered to express a minimal number of antigens.

Herpes virus vectors. Because herpes virus is trophic for cells of the nervous system (neural cells), it is an attractive vector for delivery of function PAMP genes. Various defective (non-replicating, and thus non-infectious) herpes virus vectors have been described, such as a defective herpes virus 1 (HSV 1) vector (Kaplitt et al., 1991; International Patent Publication No. WO 94/21807, published Sep. 29, 1994; International Patent Publication No. WO 92/05263, published Apr. 2, 1994).

Adenovirus vectors. Adenoviruses are eukaryotic DNA viruses that can be modified to efficiently deliver a nucleic acid of the invention to a variety of cell types in vivo, and has been used extensively in gene therapy protocols, including for targeting genes to neural cells. Various serotypes of adenovirus exist. Of these serotypes, preference is given to using type 2 or type 5 human adenoviruses (Ad 2 or Ad 5) or adenoviruses of animal origin (see WO94/26914). Those adenoviruses of animal origin which can be used within the scope of the present invention include adenoviruses of canine, bovine, murine (example: Mav1, Beard et al., 1990), ovine, porcine, avian, and simian (example: SAV) origin. Preferably, the adenovirus of animal origin is a canine adenovirus, more preferably a CAV2 adenovirus (e.g., Manhattan or A26/61 strain (ATCC VR-800), for example). Various replication defective adenovirus and minimum adenovirus vectors have been described for gene therapy (WO94/26914, WO95/02697, WO94/28938, WO94/28152, WO94/12649, WO95/02697 WO96/22378). The replication defective recombinant adenoviruses according to the invention can be prepared by any technique known to the person skilled in the art (Levrero et al., 1991; EP 185 573; Graham, 1984; Graham et al., 1977). Recombinant adenoviruses are recovered and purified using standard molecular biological techniques, which are well known to one of ordinary skill in the art.

Adeno-associated viruses. The adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are DNA viruses of relatively small size which can integrate, in a stable and site-specific manner, into the genome of the cells which they infect. They are able to infect a wide spectrum of cells without inducing any effects on cellular growth, morphology or differentiation, and they do not appear to be involved in human pathologies. The AAV genome has been cloned, sequenced and characterized. The use of vectors derived from the AAVs for transferring genes in vitro and in vivo has been described (see WO 91/18088; WO 93/09239; U.S. Pat. No. 4,797,368, U.S. Pat. No. 5,139,941, EP 488528). The replication defective recombinant AAVs according to the invention can be prepared by co-transfecting a plasmid containing the nucleic acid sequence of interest flanked by two AAV inverted terminal repeat (ITR) regions, and a plasmid carrying the AAV encapsidation genes (rep and cap genes), into a cell line which is infected with a human helper virus (for example an adenovirus). The AAV recombinants which are produced are then purified by standard techniques.

Retrovirus vectors. In another embodiment the gene can be introduced in a retroviral vector, e.g., as described in Anderson et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,399,346; Mann et al., 1983; Temin et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,650,764; Temin et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,980,289; Markowitz et al. 1988; Temin et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,124,263; EP 453242, EP178220; Bernstein et al., 1985; McCormick, 1985; International Patent Publication No. WO 95/07358, published Mar. 16, 1995, by Dougherty et al.; and Kuo et al., 1993. The retroviruses are integrating viruses which infect dividing cells. The retrovirus genome includes two LTRs, an encapsidation sequence and three coding regions (gag, pol and env). In recombinant retroviral vectors, the gag, pol and env genes are generally deleted, in whole or in part, and replaced with a heterologous nucleic acid sequence of interest. These vectors can be constructed from different types of retrovirus, such as MoMuLV (“murine Moloney leukemia virus”), MEV (“murine Moloney sarcoma virus”), HASV (“Harvey sarcoma virus”); SNV (“spleen necrosis virus”), RSV (“Rous sarcoma virus”) and Friend virus. Suitable packaging cell lines have been described in the prior art, in particular the cell line PA317 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,861,719); the PsiCRIP cell line (WO 90/02806) and the GP+envAm-12 cell line (WO 89/07150). In addition, the recombinant retroviral vectors can contain modifications within the LTRs for suppressing transcriptional activity as well as extensive encapsidation sequences which may include a part of the gag gene (Bender et al., 1987). Recombinant retroviral vectors are purified by standard techniques known to those having ordinary skill in the art.

Retrovirus vectors can also be introduced by recombinant DNA viruses, which permits one cycle of retroviral replication and amplifies transfection efficiency (see WO 95/22617, WO 95/26411, WO 96/39036, WO 97/19182).

Lentivirus vectors. In another embodiment, lentiviral vectors are can be used as agents for the direct delivery and sustained expression of a transgene in several tissue types, including brain, retina, muscle, liver and blood. The vectors can efficiently transduce dividing and non-dividing cells in these tissues, and maintain long-term expression of the gene of interest. For a review, see, Naldini, 1998; see also Zufferey, et al., 1998). Lentiviral packaging cell lines are available and known generally in the art. They facilitate the production of high-titer lentivirus vectors for gene therapy. An example is a tetracycline-inducible VSV-G pseudotyped lentivirus packaging cell line which can generate virus particles at titers greater than 106 IU/ml for at least 3 to 4 days (Kafri, et al., 1999). The vector produced by the inducible cell line can be concentrated as needed for efficiently transducing nondividing cells in vitro and in vivo.

Non-viral vectors. A vector can be introduced in vivo in a non-viral vector, e.g., by lipofection, with other transfection facilitating agents (peptides, polymers, etc.), or as naked DNA. Synthetic cationic lipids can be used to prepare liposomes for in vivo transfection, with targeting in some instances (Felgner, et. al., 1987; Felgner and Ringold, 1989; see Mackey, et al., 1988; Ulmer et al., 1993). Useful lipid compounds and compositions for transfer of nucleic acids are described in International Patent Publications WO95/18863 and WO96/17823, and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,459,127. Other molecules are also useful for facilitating transfection of a nucleic acid in vivo, such as a cationic oligopeptide (e.g., International Patent Publication WO95/21931), peptides derived from DNA binding proteins (e.g., International Patent Publication WO96/25508), or a cationic polymer (e.g., International Patent Publication WO95/21931). Recently, a relatively low voltage, high efficiency in vivo DNA transfer technique, termed electrotransfer, has been described (Mir et al., 1998; WO 99/01157; WO 99/01158; WO 99/01175). DNA vectors for gene therapy can be introduced into the desired host cells by methods known in the art, e.g., electroporation, microinjection, cell fusion, DEAE dextran, calcium phosphate precipitation, use of a gene gun (ballistic transfection), or use of a DNA vector transporter (see, e.g., Wu et al., 1992; Wu and Wu, 1988; Hartmut et al., Canadian Patent Application No. 2,012,311, filed Mar. 15, 1990; Williams et al., 1991). Receptor-mediated DNA delivery approaches can also be used (Curiel et al., 1992; Wu and Wu, 1987). U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,580,859 and 5,589,466 disclose delivery of exogenous DNA sequences, free of transfection facilitating agents, in a mammal.

EXAMPLES

The present invention will be further understood by reference to the following examples, which are provided as exemplary of the invention and not by way of limitation.

Example 1 A Novel PAMP that Mediates βAPP Processing and Notch/Glp1 Signal Transduction

This example shows that both PS1 and PS2 interact with a novel Type I transmembrane protein, PAMP, and that this novel protein also interacts with α- and β-secretase derived fragments of βAPP. We also show that abolition of functional expression of the C. elegans homologue of the protein leads to a developmental phenotype (anterior pharynx aph-2) which is thought to be due to inhibition of the glp/Notch signaling pathway. This novel protein is therefore positioned to mediate both the gain of function and loss of function phenotypes associated with presenilin missense mutations and presenilin knockouts, respectively.

Materials and Methods

Antibodies against PS1, PS2 and βAPP. An antibody, termed 1142, directed against PS1, was raised to a peptide segment corresponding to residues 30-45 of PS1 (Levesque et al., 1998; Yu et al., 1998). The peptide was synthesized by solid-phase techniques and purified by reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Peptide antigens were linked to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and used, in combination with complete Freud's adjuvant, to innoculate New Zealand White rabbits. Antisera from three rabbits was pooled, ammonium precipitated and the antibody was purified with Sulfo-link (Pierce) agarose-peptide affinity columns. Other antibodies used include antibody 369, a polyclonal rabbit-anti-human antibody directed against the C-terminus of human βAPP (Buxbaum et al., 1990); antibody 14 (Ab 14), a rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against residues 1-25 of human PS1 (Seeger et al., 1997); antibody α-PS1-CTF, a polyclonal rabbit antibody directed against the PS1 loop; and antibody DT2, a monoclonal antibody raised to a GST-fusion protein containing the PS2 N-terminal sequence from residues 1-87.

Preparation of presenilin associated components. To identify membrane associated components of the presenilin complex, an immunoaffinity procedure was used to extract PS1 and tightly associated membrane proteins from semi-purified intracellular membrane fractions. Human embryonic kidney cells (HEK) 293 (ATCC) with a stable over-expression of moderate level wild type human PS1, were grown to confluence, washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and then homogenized with Buffer A (0.25 M sucrose, 20 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and a protease inhibitor cocktail containing 5 mg/ml each of Leupeptin, Antipain, pepstatin A, Chymostatin, E64, Aprotinin, and 60 mg/ml 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride (AEBSF)). The cell homogenates were centrifuged 1000×g for 10 minutes to remove cell debris. The supernatant was then centrifuged 10,000×g for 60 minutes. The resulting membrane pellet was resuspended in Buffer B (20 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 1 M KCl, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and protease inhibitor cocktail as above) and incubated for 45 minutes with agitation at 4° C. Cell membranes were collected again by centrifugation at 107,000×g for 60 minutes. The cell membranes were then lysed on ice for 60 minutes with Buffer C (1% Digitonin, 20 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 100 mM KCl, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and protease inhibitors cocktail). After spinning 10,000×g for 15 minutes, the protein extract was adjusted with Buffer C to contain 5 mg/ml protein. A total of 0.5 g of protein was obtained.

Isolation. The extracted proteins were then subjected to fractionation with 10-40% glycerol gradient containing 0.5% Digitonin as described (Yu et al., 1998). After being verified by Western blotting with anti-PS1 antibodies, the peak fractions containing PS1 were pooled and incubated overnight with Protein A/G agarose coupled with either antibody 1142 or a control IgG purified from preimmune rabbit serum. The Protein A/G agarose beads were washed three times with Buffer D (1% Digitonin, 20 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 100 mM KCl, protease inhibitors cocktail), and three times with Buffer E (0.5% Digitonin, 0.5% CHAPS, 20 mM HEPES pH 7.2, 100 mM KCl, 10 mM CaCl₂, 5 mM MgCl₂, and the protease inhibitor cocktail as above). Isolated protein complexes were eluted from the beads with 0.1M Glycine-HCl, pH 3.0, and then neutralized with 1M Tris. Proteins were then separated by Tris-Glycine SDS-PAGE gels and stained with silver stain and Coomassie Blue stain. The staining of the immuno-purified proteins displayed two intense bands in addition to those of the presenilin holoprotein and its fragments.

Sequence analysis. Individual protein bands were cut out and analyzed with solid-phase extraction capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (SPE-CE-MS/MS). Briefly, protein bands were first digested in gel with trypsin; the digested proteins were extracted and dried in a speed vacuum down to concentrate the peptides; and the peptides thereafter separated with micro LC and analyzed by on-line tandem mass spectrometry (Figeys et al., 1999). Nucleotide and amino acid sequence homology searches were conducted using the BLAST algorithm, and motif analyses performed using the program BLOCKS.

General transfection and analysis methods. Based on the human PAMP sequence, public databases (e.g., GenBank; see ncbi.nlm.nih.gov on the World-Wide Web (www)) were searched for homologous ESTs (SEQ ID NOs: 3-10), which were collected into a few contigs. These contigs all turned out to be correct, but did not cover full-length mouse and D. melanogaster cDNAs.

Full length murine (SEQ ID NO: 15), human (SEQ ID NO: 13) and D. melanogaster (SEQ ID NO: 17) PAMP cDNAs were obtained using oligonucleotides designed from partial cDNA/EST sequences in public databases to screen appropriate cDNA libraries, for 5′RACE, and/or for RT-PCR experiments. A PAMP expression construct was generated by inserting human PAMP cDNA in-frame with the V5 epitope of pcDNA6 (Invitrogen) at the C-terminus of PAMP. HEK293 cells with a stable expression of PS1/PS2 and βAPP_(sw) were transiently transfected with either V5-tagged PAMP or empty plasmid (mock transfection control). Duplicate experiments were performed by: (1) transient transfection of V5-PAMP and βAPP₆₉₅ (or empty vector plus βAPP₆₉₅ as a mock transfection control) into murine embryonic fibroblasts stably infected with human PS1 expressed from a retroviral vector construct (Clontech, CA); or (2) transient transfection of V5-PAMP (or an empty plasmid) into HEK293 cell lines with a stable expression of the C-terminal 99 amino acids of βAPP with a preceding artificial signal peptide (spC100-APP) together with either wild type PS1, PS1-L392V, or PS1-D385A. Cells were lysed with a Digitonin lysis buffer or with 1% NP40, and the protein extracts were subjected to gradient fraction, immunoprecipitation or direct Western blotting as described (Yu et al., 1998). PS1 was immunodetected or immunoprecipitated with antibodies 14 or a-PS1-CTF; and PS2 was immunodetected or immunoprecipitated with antibody DT2. FL-βAPP and its C-terminal α- and β-secretase derivatives were detected using antibody 369.

Results

Isolation of PAMP. Immunoprecipitation of PS1 protein complexes, followed by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie Blue and silver staining, yielded two intense bands in addition to presenilin holoprotein. These bands were characterized by mass spectroscopy analysis. Mass spectroscopy analysis revealed several armadillo repeat containing peptides, (previously known to functionally interact with presenilins (Yu et al., 1998; Zhou et al. (1), 1997; Nishimura M, et al., 1999), and a novel peptide (PAMP) which had a sequence identified to that predicted for an anonymous, partial cDNA (Genbank; Accession No. D87442). The cDNA sequence predicted an open reading frame of 709 amino acids (SEQ ID NO: 14), which contains a putative N-terminal signal peptide, a long N-terminal hydrophilic domain with sequence motifs for glycosylation, N-myristoylation and phosphorylation, a ˜20 residue hydrophobic putative transmembrane domain, and a short hydrophilic C-terminus of 20 residues (FIGS. 1A and 1B).

Orthologous PAMP proteins. The PAMP amino acid sequence had no significant homology to other proteins within available databases, except for a hypothetical C. elegans protein (www.ncbi.nih.gov; Accession No. Q23316) (p=2×10⁻²⁸; identity=22%; similarity=39%) (SEQ ID NO: 12) ascertained from a genomic DNA sequence (FIGS. 1A and 1B). In addition to strong primary amino acid sequence conservation, this C. elegans protein has a very similar topology to human PAMP, suggesting that it is the nematode orthologue of human PAMP.

In the absence of functional clues arising from homologies to other known proteins, the predicted amino acid sequences of the murine (SEQ ID NO: 16) and D. melanogaster (SEQ ID NO: 18) orthologues of PAMP were cloned and examined. The four orthologous PAMP proteins had a similar topology and significant sequence conservation near residues 306-360, 419-458, and 625-662 of human PAMP (SEQ ID NO: 14) (FIGS. 1A and 1B). Motif analysis of these conserved domains revealed a weak similarity (strength=1046) between residues 625-641 (ARLARALSPAFELSQWS; SEQ ID NO: 19) of mouse and human PAMP to cyclic nucleotide binding domains. While the putative transmembrane domain sequences were not highly conserved, all four orthologues contained a conserved serine residue within this hydrophobic domain. Finally, there were four conserved cysteine residues in the—terminal hydrophilic domain (Cys₁₉₅, Cys₂₁₃, Cys₂₃₀, and Cys₂₄₈ in human PAMP) which had a periodicity of 16-17 residues in the N-terminus, and may form a functional domain (e.g., a metal binding domain or disulfide bridges for stabilizing the tertiary structure of PAMP/PAMP complexes).

Interaction of PAMP with presenilin 1. To confirm the authenticity of the PAMP:PS1 interaction, HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with PAMP cDNA (SEQ ID NO: 13) tagged at the 3′-end with a V5-epitope encoded from the pcDNA6 vector. The conditioned media were collected 20 hr after transient transfection with PAMP (or with empty vector), and the Aβ₄₀ and Aβ₄₂ levels were measured by ELISA (Zhang L, et al., 1999). In Western blots of lysates of these cells, the use of anti-V5 (Invitrogen, CA) and enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham) detected a V5-immunoreactive band of ˜110 kDa which was reduced to ˜80 kDa following Endo H digestion (equivalent to the size predicted from the PAMP amino acid sequence), confirming the predicted glycosylation of PAMP. In addition, a series of about 7-10 kDa fragments were observed, which are predicted to contain the TM domain and short C-terminus of PAMP plus the 3 kDa V5-epitope. These C-terminal derivatives may be authentic cleavage products of full-length PAMP, or, alternatively, a proteolytic artifact arising from the attachment of the V5-epitope to the C-terminus of PAMP.

Reciprocal immunoprecipitation studies in cells expressing combinations of transfected V5-tagged-PAMP, transfected wild type or mutant PS1, transfected wild type PS2, or endogenous presenilins, confirmed the PS1:PAMP interaction, and showed a similar interaction between PAMP and PS2. In contrast, immunoprecipitation of other ER-resident proteins (e.g., calnexin) failed to show any evidence of an interaction between these proteins and PAMP. Glycerol velocity gradient analysis of the native conformation of PAMP revealed that PAMP was co-eluted into the same high molecular weight fractions as PS1 and PS2, indicating that it is an authentic component of the high molecular weight presenilin protein complexes. These biochemical data were supported by immunocytochemical studies, which showed that transfected PAMP and endogenous PS1 strongly co-localized in the ER and Golgi in MDCK canine kidney/epithelial cells (ATCC). Similar studies with PS2 confirmed that PAMP also tightly associates with both endogenous PS2 in human brain and with transfected PS2 in HEK293 cells.

The PAMP gene. Chromosomal locations and genetic map positions of the murine and human PAMPS were obtained from public genetic and transcriptional maps (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The gene encoding PAMP is located on human chromosome 1 near the genetic markers D151595 and D1S2844. The 5′-end of the PAMP gene is embedded in the 5′-end of the coatmer gene encoded on the opposite strand. The human PAMP gene is close to a cluster of markers which have yielded positive, but sub-significant evidence for linkage to or association with Alzheimer Disease in two independent genome wide surveys (Kehoe et al., 1999). The murine PAMP maps within a 700 Kb interval of murine chromosome 1 which contains the gene defect associated with Looptail phenotype in mice (Underhill et al., 1999). Mice heterozygous for Looptail show developmental defects in dorsal axial structures including notochord, brain, spinal cord, and somites (Greene et al., 1998), which are reminiscent of those observed in PS1^(−/−) mice (Shen J, et al., 1997; Wong et al., 1997). These observations suggest that the presenilin: PAMP complex may be involved in both βAPP and Notch processing.

C. elegans homolog of PAMP. The C. elegans homolog of PAMP corresponds to the aph-2 gene. Mutations in aph-2 have been identified in a screen for mutants with phenotypes identical to embryonic mutant phenotypes caused by loss of glp-1 activity, i.e., lack of an anterior pharynx, e.g. cDNA clone. The EST corresponding to aph-2, (cDNA clone yk477b8, kindly provided by Y. Kohara, National Institute of Genetics, Japan) was sequenced and the coding region (SEQ ID NO: 11) found to match exactly the Genefinder prediction made by the C. elegans sequencing consortium (Genbank; Accession No. Z75714). Double stranded RNA interference (RNAi) confirmed the mutant phenotype of aph-2. Sense and antisense RNA were transcribed in vitro from PCR product amplified from the phage yk477b8. After annealing equal quantities of sense and antisense products, the dsRNA product made was injected into L4 stage wild-type worms. The chosen line of worms, designated lin-12(n302) (Greenwald and Seydoux, 1990; Greenwald, et al., 1983) was obtained from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center. Injected animals were transferred to fresh plates daily and the progeny scored at least 36 hours after injection for the embryonic lethal phenotype and 4-5 days after injection for the egg-laying phenotypes. Animals injected with dsRNA from yk477b8 template produced eggs that lacked an anterior pharynx. These results support the notion that aph-2/PAMP contributes to cell interactions mediated by glp-1/Notch in the embryo.

Functional role for the PAMP:presenilin complexes in βAPP processing. To examine a functional role for the PAMP:presenilin complexes in βAPP processing, the interactions between PAMP, PS1, and βAPP, and its derivatives were investigated. The cell lines used were transiently transfected with V5-tagged PAMP, and stably expressing wild type βAPP₆₉₅ in addition to wild type PS1, wild type PS2, PS1-L392V mutant, or PS1-D385A mutant. The PS1-L392V mutation is a pathogenic mutation associated with familial AD (Sherrington et al., 1995) and with increased secretion of Aβ₄₂ (Scheuner et al., 1996; Citron et al., 1997). The PS1-D385A mutation is a loss of function mutation associated with inhibition of PS1 endoproteolysis and a decrease in γ-secretase activity (Wolfe et al., 1999). The conditioned media were collected 20 hr after transient transfection with PAMP (or with empty vector), and the Aβ₄₀ and Aβ₄₂ levels were measured by ELISA (Zhang et al., 1999). Analysis of Western blots from these co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that PAMP holoprotein (and C-terminally tagged proteolytic fragments of PAMP) interacted in equivalent degrees with wild type PS1, wild type PS2, PS1-L392V mutant, and PS1-D385A mutant proteins. In addition, PAMP holoprotein and the C-terminal proteolytic fragments of PAMP also co-immunoprecipitated with the C-terminal proteolytic fragments of βAPP but not βAPP holoprotein in lysates of cells expressing either βAPP holoprotein or just the C-terminal 99 amino acids of βAPP. Significantly, compared to cells expressing equivalent quantities of wild type PS1, cell lines expressing pathogenic mutations of PS1 showed increased amounts of C-terminal βAPP fragments co-immunoprecipitating with PAMP. Conversely, cell lines expressing the loss-of-function PS1-D385A mutation showed greatly reduced amounts of C-terminal βAPP derivatives co-immunoprecipitating with PAMP despite the presence of very large amounts of C-terminal βAPP derivatives in these cells.

These results were confirmed in HEK293 cells over-expressing either βAPP_(Swedish) or the SpC99-βAPP cDNA. The latter encodes the C-terminal 99 residues of βAPP (corresponding to the products of β-secretase cleavage) plus the βAPP signal peptide. The interaction of PAMP appears much stronger with C99-βAPP than that with C83-βAPP. However, C83-βAPP is much less abundant in these cells (FIG. 6 b, middle panel, lanes 1-4). In fact, PAMP does interact with both C99- and C83-βAPP stubs (see FIG. 6 c, lane 9 and FIG. 8 d). Cumulatively, these results indicate that PAMP likely interacts with the C-terminal derivatives of βAPP which are the immediate precursors of Aβ and p3. However, of greater interest, the genotype of the co-expressed PS1 molecule dynamically influenced the interaction between PAMP and C99-/C83-βAPP stubs. Thus, more C-terminal βAPP fragments co-immunoprecipitated with PAMP in cells expressing the FAD-associated PS1-L392V mutation compared to cells expressing wild type PS1 (and equivalent quantities of nicastrin and C9-βAPP). Conversely, much less C terminal βAPP derivatives co-immunoprecipitated with PAMP in cell lines expressing the loss-of-function PS1-D385A mutation (despite the presence of very large amounts of C-terminal βAPP derivatives in these cells). These effects are more easily seen in cells over-expressing the C99-βAPP construct. However, similar but less pronounced differences were also observed in cells over-expressing full-length βAPP_(Swedish). More importantly, the PS1-sequence-related differences in the interaction of PAMP with C-terminal βAPP derivatives were most evident within 24 hours of transient transfection of PAMP. By 72 hours, the PS1-sequence-related differences were largely abolished. This dynamic change in the interaction of PAMP with C99/C83-βAPP was not due to changes in the levels of PS1, C-terminal βAPP derivatives or PAMP. One interpretation of these results is that the presenilins may be dynamically involved in regulating or loading PAMP with the substrates of γ-secretase.

Presenilin binding domains of PAMP. In transiently transfected cells (in which the 7-10 kDa C-terminal of PAMP can be detected), anti-PS1 immunoprecipitation products contain both full length PAMP and the 7-10 kDa C-terminal PAMP fragments. Similarly, in these cells, immunoprecipitation with antibodies to the C-terminus of βAPP (Ab369) also renders C-terminal nicastrin epitopes. The TM domain of PAMP is not highly conserved in evolution. These results suggest that the C99-/C83-βAPP and PS1/PS2-binding domain(s) of PAMP are in the TM domain or C-terminus.

Discussion

The above results indicate that PAMP is a component of the PS1 and PS2 intracellular complexes. The observations that PAMP also binds to the C-terminal fragment of βAPP (arising from α- and β-secretase cleavage of full length βAPP), that the degree of binding of these fragments to PAMP is modulated by mutations in PS1, and that the direction of this modulation is congruent with the effects of each mutant of Aβ production (i.e., the pathogenic L392V mutation increases binding to PAMP and increases Aβ₄₂ production whereas the D385A mutation has the opposite effects) strongly argues that PAMP is part of a functional complex involved in processing of C-terminal βAPP derivatives. Similarly, the observation that inhibition of PAMP expression in C. elegans leads to a phenotype similar to that of glp/Notch loss of function, argues that PAMP, like PS1 and PS2, is also a functional component of the pathways involved in processing of Notch. This conclusion is strengthened by the fact that the murine PAMP gene maps within a 700 kb interval on murine chromosome 1 which carries the Looptail mutant, and is thus likely to be the site of the Looptail mutation. Looptail has a number of phenotypic similarities to those of Notch and PS1 knockouts in mice. Because Looptail is a model of human spinal cord malformations including spina bifida, PAMP biology may also provide some useful insights into this neurological developmental defect as well.

At the current time the exact role of PAMP in the presenilin-complex-mediated processing of βAPP and Notch-like molecules is not fully defined. Inspection of the primary amino acid sequence of PAMP does not reveal very strong homologies to known proteases. However, the recombinant expression systems of the invention permit evaluation of three-dimensional structure of PAMP; it is possible that PAMP itself has a protease activity. However, it is currently more plausible that PAMP plays another role in βAPP and Notch processing. Thus, PAMP may be involved in the function of PS1 and PS2 complexes by binding substrates for γ-secretase. The efficacy of this binding is clearly modulated by PS1 mutations in a direction which is commensurate with the effect of these mutations on 7-secretase activity. Alternatively, PAMP may have a regulatory role on the activity of the presenilin complexes. This is consistent with the observation that residues 625-641 of human and murine PAMP contain a motif similar to cyclic nucleotide binding domains of several other unrelated proteins.

Regardless of its precise role, it is clear that PAMP and PS1 both play important roles in γ-secretase mediated processing of βAPP. Hence, knowledge of PAMP and its biology will now serve as a target for efforts to manipulate the function of the presenilin complexes in patients with schizophrenia and/or Alzheimer Disease and related disorders, patients with malignancies (in which the presenilins have been implicated by virtue of a role in programmed cell death), and in disorders of development especially of the spinal cord and brain (in view of the known effects of PS1 knockout and the strong likelihood that PAMP is the site of Looptail mutations in mice). In particular, knowledge of the domains of PAMP involved in binding presenilins and βAPP derivatives (which currently appears to be located within the C-terminal transmembrane and hydrophilic domains of PAMP) and the identification of putative ligands interacting with the conserved domains at the hydrophilic N-terminus of PAMP will considerably expedite this goal.

We have found that the strength of the interaction between PAMP and the C-terminal fragments of βAPP (which is the precursor Aβ) is determined by the genotype at PS1. Thus, clinical mutations in PS1 cause Alzheimer Disease and an increase in the production of Aβ₄₂ are associated with increased binding of the C-terminal fragments of βAPP to PAMP. Conversely, loss of function mutations in PS1 (Asp385Ala) which inhibit γ-secretase cleavage of C-terminal fragments of βAPP, are associated with abolition of the interaction between PAMP and the C-terminal fragments of βAPP.

Finally, the apparent C-terminal proteolytic derivatives of βAMP could either be authentic, or simply artifacts due to the V-5 tag. If they are authentic, this observation raises the possibility that PAMP may undergo post-translational processing events which are potentially similar to those of βAPP and/or Notch. Three observations support our discovery of PAMP. First, in contrast to βAPP and Notch, which are not major constituents of the high molecular weight presenilin complexes, and which can only be inconsistently shown to be directly associated with PS1/PS2, PAMP is a major stoichiometric component of the presenilin complexes. Second, PAMP selectively interacts only with C-terminal derivatives of βAPP which are substrates for γ-secretase cleavage, and this interaction is modulated by PS1 mutations in a way which reflects the functional consequences of these PS1 mutations. Third, inhibition of PAMP expression in C. elegans leads to a disease phenotype likely to be in the glp/Notch signaling pathway.

Example 2 PAMP Mutants

Site-directed mutagenesis was used to generate the following artificial mutations in PAMP: Cys: PAMP_(C230A) in the 4 conserved cystine motif DYIGS: PAMP_(D336A/Y337A) in the central conserved region D369L: PAMP_(Δ312-369) in the central conserved region D340X: PAMP_(Δ312-340) in the central conserved region YDT: PAMP_(D458A) in the putative ‘aspartyl protease’ DTA site SPAF: PAMP_(D633A/F635A) in the SPAF motif TM: PAMP_(S683A) in the TM domain C3D: PAMP_(Δ630-668) in the conserved region adjacent to the TM domain

To further examine the role of PAMP in βAPP processing, we inserted PAMP cDNAs, harboring the above mutations as well as normal/wild type PAMP (PAMP_(wt)) cDNA and the cDNA for an unrelated protein (LacZ), in frame into pcDNA6 vectors. A series of HEK293 cell lines stably expressing endogenous PS1, βAPP_(Swedish) and either wild type PAMP or PAMP constructs in which various conserved domains had been mutated or deleted, were then created by transfection. PAMP expressing cells were selected with lasticidin to generate stable cell lines. Conditioned media from these cell lines were collected after 6-24 hours and Aβ₄₀ and Aβ₄₂ were measured by ELISA. In the PAMP_(D336A/Y337A) mutant, both Aβ₄₀ and Aβ₄₂ levels were increased, and there was also a 68% increase in Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio which is very similar to that observed in clinical mutations in APP, PS1, and PS2, associated with early onset Alzheimer Disease. The Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio was also increased in one cell line expressing the PAMP_(C230A) mutant.

In contrast, both the total Aβ₄₂ and Aβ₄₀ levels and the Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio were massively reduced (to only 18% of the control) in the PAMP_(Δ312-369) mutant. A similar but less profound reduction of both the total Aβ₄₂ and Aβ₄₀ levels and the Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio was observed in the conditioned medium from the PAMP_(Δ312-340) cell lines.

There is no apparent difference in Aβ₄₂ or Aβ₄₀ levels, or in the Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio, when the PAMP_(wt), PAMP_(D458A), PAMP_(Δ630-668), PAMP_(P633A/F635A), and PAMP_(S683A) cells were compared to control lines (expressing LacZ, or empty vector).

Thus, certain PAMP mutants cause biochemical changes similar to those induced by mutations in the βAPP, PS1, and PS2 genes which give rise to AD, and which may be implicated also in schizophrenia. These artificial PAMP mutations can therefore be used to generate cellular and other model systems to design treatments and preventions for schizophrenia, AD and other neurodegenerative and/or neuropsychiatric disorders. These mutations also show that PAMP is involved in the pathogenesis of AD, and may provide information for the design of specific molecular diagnostics or therapeutics for schizophrenia, AD, and other neurological disorders.

When compared to mock-transfected or LacZ transfected cells, overexpression of wild type PAMP, and overexpression of most PAMP mutation- or deletion-constructs had no significant effect on Aβ secretion. However, missense mutation of the conserved DYIGS motif to AAIGS (residues 336-340 of human PAMP) caused a significant increase in Aβ₄₂ secretion, a smaller increase in Aβ₄₀ secretion, and an increase in the Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ ratio (p<0.001; Table 2). This increase in Aβ₄₂ production was equivalent to that of FAD-related missense mutations in PS1. Conversely, deletion of the DYIGS domain in two independent constructs (PAMP_(Δ312-369) and PAMP_(Δ312-340)) caused a significant reduction in both Aβ₄₂ and Aβ₄₀ secretion which was more profound in PAMP_(Δ312-369) cells than in PAMP_(Δ312-340) cells (Table 2). The magnitude of the reduction in Aβ secretion in PAMP_(Δ312-369) cells was equivalent to that observed with the PS1-D385A loss-of-function mutation. Somewhat unexpectedly, and in contrast to PS1^(−/−) and PS1-D385A cells, the reduction in Aβ secretion in NCT_(Δ312-369) and NCT_(Δ312-340) cells was not accompanied by the expected accumulation of C99- and C83-βAPP stubs. Since there was no consistent change in the levels of soluble βAPP (βAPP_(s)) in the conditioned medium of any of the PAMP mutant cells, the most probable explanation for this result is that C99- and C83-βAPP stubs which do not enter the PAMP:presenilin complex for γ-secretase cleavage to Aβ may be degraded by other pathways.

The effects of PAMP mutations on Aβ secretion were not due to trivial explanations such as differences in the levels of PAMP, βAPP holoprotein, or PS1/PS2. None of these mutations caused any consistent, detectable change in the amount of APP_(s) in conditioned medium or in the amount of C99/C83-βAPP that could be co-immunoprecipitated with PAMP. However, both the PAMP_(Δ312-369) mutant and the PAMP_(Δ312-340) deletion mutant significantly reduced the amount of PS1 which could be co-immunoprecipitated with PAMP. Interestingly, the reduction in efficiency of binding to PS1 was proportional to the reduction in Aβ secretion induced by each deletion mutant. Multiple mechanisms underlying the effect of mutations in the first conserved domain can explain these results. This domain contains no obvious functional motifs (e.g., for glycosylation etc.), nor does it have significant sequence homology to other known proteins. Consequently, the three functionally active PAMP mutations either affect a presenilin-binding domain in PAMP, or affect a specific regulatory domain of PAMP which modulates both direct binding of PAMP to PS1 and the subsequent γ-secretase-mediated cleavage of PAMP-bound C99- and C83-βAPP stubs. TABLE 2 Normalized Normalized Aβ₄₂/Aβ₄₀ Transfection Aβ₄₂ Aβ₄₀ Ratio Mock (LacZ/empty 1.0 1.0 1.0 vector) wild type PAMP 1.03 ± 0.09 1.05 ± 0.07 0.99 ± 0.07 D336A/Y337A 3.09 ± 0.59 1.61 ± 0.19 1.81 ± 0.15 (p < 0.001) (p = 0.001) (p < 0.001) PAMP_(Δ312-369) 0.05 ± 0.04 0.31 ± 0.06 0.09 ± 0.05 (p < 0.001) (p < 0.001) (p < 0.001) PAMP_(Δ312-340) 0.33 ± 0.04 0.55 ± 0.04 0.59 ± 0.06 (p = 0.002) (p = 0.001) (p = 0.003)

Example 3 PAMP Interaction with Notch

PAMP interaction with Notch was studied using a Notch-cleavage assay (De Strooper, 1999). Notch cDNA was tagged with myc to the membrane-portion of Notch or to the soluble proteolytic derivative called Notch intra-cellular domain (NICD). V5-epitope-tagged PAMP and myc-tagged-Notch cDNAs were co-transfected into HEK293 cells. Thereafter, V5-tagged-PAMP was immunoprecipitated with anti-V5-antibodies, and the immunoprecipitation products investigated for myc-tagged proteins. In the immunoprecipitate, myc-tagged-Notch was found, but not myc-tagged-NICD. This result indicates a specific interaction between PAMP and the Notch precursor (which is the expected substrate for presenilin-dependent S3 cleavage). In contrast, PAMP did not bind to NICD, which arises as a product of presenilin-PAMP-mediated S3 cleavage of the Notch precursor.

Example 4 PAMP Screening of Schizophrenia Patients

A study is conducted to investigate PAMP sequence, its expression levels, and its activity, in selected study objects. Initially, the study objects are selected from families having (1) increased rates of schizophrenia, and (2) a high proportion linked to the susceptibility locus on chromosome 1 q21-q22 as described in Brzustowicz et al., 2000. Control individuals are selected from families with no or only a rare occurrence of schizophrenia.

Tissue samples are collected from study objects and control objects. The samples can be obtained either by sampling tissue fluids such as blood and cerebrospinal fluid, or by taking biopsies from selected tissues. In certain instances it may be preferable to collect tissue biopsies, e.g. from brain, kidney, or lung, from deceased study or control objects, i.e. post-mortem.

The samples are analyzed for at least one of the following: (1) sequence of the entire or selected portions of the PAMP gene; (2) sequence and levels of PAMP mRNA; (3) sequence, levels, and activity of PAMP protein; (4) levels of a PAMP substrate. Identification of relevant mutations in the PAMP gene or mRNA is performed by using PCR together with primers specific for PAMP DNA or mRNA and radiolabeled nucleotides, hybridization analysis, and/or other automated sequencing techniques described herein or in references provided in the present disclosure, which are all incorporated by reference. Mutations in and levels of the PAMP protein is studied by, e.g., purifying PAMP from the tissue sample, performing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or other quantitative or semi-quantitative immunoassays, Edman degradation analysis, mass-spectroscopy, Western blotting, or other analytical techniques described herein or in references in the present disclosure. PAMP biological activity assays are conducted as described herein by either in vivo methods (e.g., monitoring βAPP processing and the production of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ), or other suitable protein substrates for PAMP including Notch, etc.), or by in vitro assays (using either whole cell or cell-free assays to measure processing of suitable substrates including βAPP or parts thereof, and other proteins such as Notch).

The results from these assays will preferably show any significant correlation between mutations in and/or expression levels of PAMP or the PAMP gene and susceptibility to schizophrenia. PAMP or PAMP mutations, or altered PAMP or PAMP levels, identified in this manner can advantageously be used in the creation of in vivo assays (e.g., transgenic animals) or in vitro assays to study induction and/or progression of schizophrenia, as well as in the screening of potential therapeutic agents for schizophrenia. For instance, in an in vivo transgenic/recombinant mouse model, partial phenotypes could be examined via behavioral deficits in, e.g., exploratory behavior, novelty seeking, cognitive flexibility/rigidity, sensitivity to dopamine-induced motor disturbances, etc. (see Cloninger et al., 1996).

The present invention is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments described herein. Indeed, various modifications of the invention in addition to those described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description and the accompanying figures. Such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.

It is further to be understood that values are approximate, and are provided for description.

Patents, patent applications, and publications are cited throughout this application, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

-   Altschul et al., J Mol Biol 1990; 215: 403-410. -   Araki et al., Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:868 et seq. -   Ausubel et al. (eds.), Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John     Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994. -   Baker, Bioessays 2000; 22:264-273. -   Beard et al., Virology 1990; 75:81 et seq. -   Bender et al., J. Virol. 1987; 61:1639 et seq. -   Bernstein et al. Genet. Eng. 1985; 7:235 et seq. -   Borchelt et al., Neuron 1996; 17:1005-1013 -   Brzustowicz et al., Science 2000; 288:678-682. -   Buxbaum et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990; 87: 6003-6007 -   Chen, Mol. Med. Today, 1997; 3:160-167 -   Citron et al., Nature Med. 1997; 3:67-72 -   Cloninger et al., Nature Genet. 1996; 12:3-4. -   Coffman, Semin. Nephrol. 1997; 17:404 et seq. -   Cole et al., in Monoclonal Antibodies and Cancer Therapy, Alan R.     Liss, Inc., pp. 77-96, 1985. -   Cote et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1983; 80:2026-2030. -   Curiel et al., Hum. Gene Ther. 1992; 3:147-154. -   Cwirla, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1990; 87:6378-6382. -   De Strooper et al., Nature 1999; 398:518-522 -   De Strooper et al., J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272:3590-3598 -   De Strooper et al., Nature 1998; 391:387-390. -   Devlin et al., Science, 1990; 49:404-406. -   Doan et al., Neuron 1996, 17:1023-1030 -   Duff et al., Nature 1996; 383:710-713 -   Elefanty et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:11897, 1998. -   Esther et al., Lab. Invest. 1996; 74:953 et seq. -   Falkai et al., Biol Psychiatry 2000; 47:937-943. -   Feigner and Ringold, Science 1989; 337:387-388. -   Felgner, et. al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1987; 84:7413-7417. -   Figeys et al., Anal Chem 1999; 71: 2279-2287. -   Flaum et al., In: Widiger et al. (eds.): DSM-IV Sourcebook, Vol. 4.     Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association, 1997. -   Fodor et al., Science 1991; 251:767-773 -   Freshney R I (ed), Animal Cell Culture, 1986. -   Furka et al., 14th Int. Congress of Biochemistry, 1988; 5:Abstract     FR:013. -   Furka, Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 1991; 37:487-493 -   Geysen et al., J. Immunologic Method 1987; 102:259-274. -   Geysen et al., Molecular Immunology 1986; 23:709-715. -   Gillman et al., Gene 1979; 8:81-97. -   Glover (ed.), DNA Cloning: A Practical Approach, Volumes I and II,     1985. -   Goate et al., Nature 1991; 349:704-706. -   Graham et al., J. Gen. Virol. 1977; 36:59 et seq. -   Graham, EMBO J. 1984; 3:2917 et seq. -   Greene N D, et al., Mech Dev 1998; 73: 59-72. -   Greenwald, et al., Cell 1983: 34; 435-444. -   Greenwald and Seydoux, Nature 1990: 346:197-199. -   Haass and Selkoe, Nature 1998; 391:387-390 -   Hames & Higgins (eds.), Transcription And Translation, 1984. -   Hames & Higgins (eds.), Nucleic Acid Hybridization, 1985. -   Handler et al., Development 2000 June; 127(12):2593-606. -   Hartmann et al., Curr Biol 1999; 15:719-727. -   Huse et al., Science 246:1275-1281, 1989 -   Immobilized Cells And Enzymes, JRL Press, 1986 -   Indolfi et al., Nat. Med., 1996; 2:634-635 -   Innis (ed.), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications,     Academic Press, New York, 1990. -   Jones et al., Nature Genet. 1992; 1:306-309. -   Kafri, et al., J. Virol., 1999; 73: 576-584. -   Kaplitt et al., Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 1991; 2:320-330. -   Kehoe P, et al. Hum Mol Genet. 1999; 8: 237-245. -   Kijima et al., Pharmacol. Ther. 1995; 68:247-267. -   Köhler and Milstein, Nature 1975; 256:495-497. -   Kozbor et al., Immunology Today 1983; 4:72 et seq. -   Kuo et al., Blood 1993; 82:845 et seq. -   Lehmann et al., J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272:12047-12051 -   Levesque et al., J Neurochem 1998: 72:999-1008 -   Levitan et al., Nature 1995; 377:351-354 -   Levrero et al., Gene 1991; 101:195 et seq. -   Levy-Lahad et al, Science 1995; 269:970-973 -   Li et al., Cell 1997; 90:917-927 -   M. J. Gait (ed.), Oligonucleotide Synthesis, 1984. -   Mackey, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988; 85:8027-8031. -   Main et al., 1983, Cell 1983; 33:153 et seq. -   Margalit, et al., J. Immunol., 1987; 138:2213 et seq. -   Markowitz et al., 1988, J. Virol. 1988; 62:1120 et seq. -   Martin et al., NeuroReport 1995; 7:217-220 -   McCormick, BioTechnology 1985; 3:689 et seq. -   Mir et al., C.P. Acad. Sci., 1998; 321:893 et seq. -   Morrison et al., J. Bacteriol. 1984; 159:870 et seq. -   Murakami et al., Blood Press. 1996; 2(Suppl.):36 et seq. -   Naldini, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 1998; 9:457-63. -   Needels et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993; 90:10700-4. -   Neuberger et al., Nature 1984; 312:604-608. -   Nielsen et al., Science 1991; 254:1497 et seq. -   Nishimura M, et al., Nature Med 1999; 5: 164-169. -   Ohlmeyer et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993; 90: 10922-10926. -   Paffenholtz et al., Exp Cell Res 1999; 250:452-464 -   Paffenholtz et al., Differentiation 1997; 61:293-304 -   Perbal, A Practical Guide To Molecular Cloning, 1984 -   Reeck et al., Cell 50:667, 1987. -   Roberts et al. Nature 1987; 328:731-734. -   Roemer et al., New Biol. 3:331, 1991. -   Rogaev et al., Nature 1995; 376:775-778 -   Rothbard, Ann. Inst. Pateur., 1986; 137E:518 et seq. -   Rothbard and Taylor, EMBO J. 1988; 7:93 et seq. -   Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second     Edition (1989) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring     Harbor, N. Y. -   Scheuner et al., Nature Med. 1996; 2:864-870. -   Scheuner D, et al. Nature Med 1996; 2: 864-870. -   Scott and Smith, Science 1990; 249:386-390. -   Seeger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1997; 94: 5090-5094. -   Selkoe, Curr Opin Neurobiol 2000; 10:50-57. -   Shen J, et al., Cell 1997; 89: 629-639. -   Sherrington et al., Nature 1995; 375:754-760 -   Song et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:6959-6963 -   Spitz et al., Anticancer Res. 1996; 16:3415-3422 -   Spouge et al., J. Immunol. 1987; 138:2204 et seq. -   Stefan and Murray, Acta Pædiatrica Suppl. 1997; 422: 112-116. -   Struhl and Greenwald, Nature 1999; 398:522-525 -   Takeda et al., Nature 1985; 314:452-454. -   Ulmer et al., Science 1993; 259:1745-1748. -   Underhill D A, et al., Genomics 1999; 55: 185-193 -   Walter et al., Molec. Medicine 1996; 2:673-691. -   Wei and Hemmings, Nature Genet. 2000; 25:376-377. -   Westphal and Leder, Curr Biol 1997; 7:530 et seq. -   Williams et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991; 88:2726-2730. -   Wilson et al., Nature 1994; 368:32-38. -   Wilson and Kay, Nat. Med. 1995 September; 1(9):887-9. -   Wolfe M S, et al., Nature 1999; 398: 513-517 -   Wolozin et al., Science 1996; 274:1710-1713 -   Wong P C, et al., Nature 1997; 387:288-292. -   Wu et al., J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267:963-967. -   Wu and Wu, J. Biol. Chem. 1987; 262:4429-4432. -   Wu and Wu, J. Biol. Chem. 1988; 263:14621-14624. -   Ye et al., Nature 1999; 398:525-529. -   Yu et al., Biol Chem 1998; 273:16470-16475 -   Yu et al., Nature, in press, 2000. -   Zhang L, et al., J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 8966-8972 -   Zhang and Henderson, Biotechniques 1998; 25:784 et seq. -   Zhou, et al., Genes and Development 1995; 9:2623-34. -   Zhou et al. (1), Neuro. Report (Fast Track) 1997; 8:1025-1029. -   Zhou et al. (2), Neuroreport 1997; 8:2085-2090. -   Zufferey, et al., J. Virol., 1998; 72:9873-80.     Patent Literature: -   Canadian Patent Application No. 2,012,311 -   European Patent Publication No. EP 453242 -   European Patent Publication No. EP 488528 -   European Patent Publication No. EP178220 -   European Patent Publication No. EP 185 573 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 96/34099 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 95/02697 -   International Patent Application No. WO 95/22617 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 96/22378 -   International Patent Application No. WO 91/09967 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 89/12690 -   International Patent Publication No. WO95/02697 -   International Patent Publication No. WO94/12649 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 91/18088 -   International Patent Publication No. WO94/28152 -   International Patent Application No. WO94/26914 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 92/00252 -   International Patent Publication No. WO94/28938 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 9428028 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 99/01175 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 99/01158 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 99/01157 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 95/07358 -   International Patent Application No. WO 95/28494 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 93/09239 -   International Patent Publication No. WO95/21931 -   International Patent Publication No. WO96/25508 -   International Patent Publication No. WO95/21931 -   International Patent Publication No. WO96/17823 -   International Patent Publication No. WO95/18863 -   International Patent Publication No. WO94/26914 -   International Patent Application No. WO 90/02806 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 94/21807 -   International Patent Application No. WO 89/07150 -   International Patent Application No. WO 96/39036 -   International Patent Application No. WO 97/19182 -   International Patent Publication No. WO 92/05263 -   International Patent Application No. WO 95/26411 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,986,054 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,040,540 -   U.S. Pat. No. 6,020,143 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,654,168 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,124,263 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,010,175 -   U.S. Pat. No. 4,631,211 -   U.S. Pat. No. 4,980,289 -   U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,317 -   U.S. Pat. No. 4,946,778 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,132,405 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,195 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,786 -   U.S. Pat. No. 4,650,764 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,399,346 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,225,539 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,801,030 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,762 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,693,761 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,139,941 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,585,089 -   U.S. Pat. No. 4,797,368 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,616,491 -   U.S. Pat. No. 4,861,719 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,459,127. -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,844 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,500 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,811,234 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,780,607 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,437 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,682 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,580,859 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,466 -   U.S. Pat. No. 5,637,684 

1. A method for detecting a mutation in presenilin associated membrane protein (AMP) associated with a neuropsychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorder, which method comprises detecting a variation in a sequence of a gene encoding PAMP obtained from an individual diagnosed with or suspected of having said disorder.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the disorder is schizophrenia.
 3. A method for diagnosing individuals predisposed to or having a neuropsychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorder, which method comprises detecting a mutation in a gene encoding PAMP obtained from an individual.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the disorder is schizophrenia.
 5. The method according to claim 3, wherein detection of the mutation comprises measuring a level of transcriptional activity of the gene.
 6. The method according to claim 3, wherein detection of the mutation comprises measuring PAMP activity.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein said PAMP activity comprises PAMP expression level or activity of a product of a PAMP modified substrate.
 8. A method for identifying a compound that is useful in treating a neuropsychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorder, which method comprises detecting modulation of PAMP expression in a transgenic animal that expresses PAMP, wherein the animal is contacted with the compound.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the disorder is schizophrenia.
 10. A method for identifying a compound that is useful in treating a neuropsychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorder, which method comprises: (a) contacting a reconstituted system for measuring presenilin associated membrane protein (AMP) activity, comprising PAMP, or a functional fragment thereof, and a PAMP substrate, with a test compound; and (b) detecting a difference in PAMP activity in the presence of the compound compared to the PAMP activity in the absence of the compound.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the disorder is schizophrenia.
 12. A method for identifying a compound that is useful in treating a neuropsychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorder, which method comprises: (a) contacting a complex between a presenilin associated membrane protein (PAMP) and an agent, which agent provides a detectable conformational or functional change in said PAMP upon interaction with a substance being analyzed for activity against a neurodegenerative disease, with a test compound; and (b) detecting a conformational or functional change in PAMP in the complex.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the disorder is schizophrenia.
 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the test compound is a protein that interacts with PAMP.
 15. A method for treating neuropsychiatric or neurodevelopmental disorder in a mammalian host which expresses at least one PAMP protein or a naturally occurring variant, which method comprises administering to the host an amount of compound effective to modulate PAMP expression in the host.
 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the disorder is schizophrenia. 